[Bug 100067] [OpenCL] const int in argument list crashes build

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100067

            Bug ID: 100067
           Summary: [OpenCL] const int in argument list crashes build
           Product: Mesa
           Version: 17.0
          Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
                OS: Linux (All)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Drivers/Gallium/radeonsi
          Assignee: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: mastner at hotmail.com
        QA Contact: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org

When running the program:

https://github.com/CNugteren/myGEMM/blob/master/extra/minimal.cpp

it crashes. valgrind output is:

valgrind ./minimal 
==3618== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==3618== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==3618== Using Valgrind-3.12.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==3618== Command: ./minimal
==3618== 
>>> Initializing OpenCL...
% Device: AMD TONGA (DRM 3.8.0 / 4.9.11-1-ARCH, LLVM 3.9.1), 7253.7 MiB memory,
max allocation 1813.4 MiB, driver  17.0.1
==3618== Invalid read of size 1
==3618==    at 0xAACAB18:
llvm::SIInstrInfo::getInstSizeInBytes(llvm::MachineInstr const&) const (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0xAA5F550:
llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::getSIProgramInfo(llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::SIProgramInfo&,
llvm::MachineFunction const&) const (in /usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0xAA625B9:
llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9D591D0:
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9BF17C1: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
(in /usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9BF1B4A: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9BF1E73: llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x7CB9742: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7CB9D5F: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7CB611D: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7CA7AF8: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7C859CB: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==  Address 0x400c07ab25 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==3618== 
==3618== 
==3618== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV):
dumping core
==3618==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x400C07AB25
==3618==    at 0xAACAB18:
llvm::SIInstrInfo::getInstSizeInBytes(llvm::MachineInstr const&) const (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0xAA5F550:
llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::getSIProgramInfo(llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::SIProgramInfo&,
llvm::MachineFunction const&) const (in /usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0xAA625B9:
llvm::AMDGPUAsmPrinter::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9D591D0:
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9BF17C1: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
(in /usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9BF1B4A: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x9BF1E73: llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) (in
/usr/lib/libLLVM-3.9.so)
==3618==    by 0x7CB9742: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7CB9D5F: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7CB611D: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7CA7AF8: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==    by 0x7C859CB: ??? (in /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so.1.0.0)
==3618==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==3618==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==3618==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==3618==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==3618==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==3618== 
==3618== HEAP SUMMARY:
==3618==     in use at exit: 27,389,789 bytes in 3,698 blocks
==3618==   total heap usage: 82,326 allocs, 78,628 frees, 58,257,510 bytes
allocated
==3618== 
==3618== LEAK SUMMARY:
==3618==    definitely lost: 16 bytes in 2 blocks
==3618==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3618==      possibly lost: 245,866 bytes in 375 blocks
==3618==    still reachable: 27,143,907 bytes in 3,321 blocks
==3618==                       of which reachable via heuristic:
==3618==                         newarray           : 340,712 bytes in 7 blocks
==3618==                         multipleinheritance: 632 bytes in 2 blocks
==3618==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3618== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==3618== 
==3618== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==3618== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Speicherzugriffsfehler (Speicherabzug geschrieben)

It does not so when the int arguments in the OpenCL kernel are changed
to unsigned int.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20170305/772a4a8c/attachment.html>