0day 'make htmldocs' testing (was: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Add missing description to parameter)

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 08 Mar 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2017, Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:35:11PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> Gabriel Krisman reported these warnings when building the documentation:
>>> 
>>>  ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:1165: warning: No description found
>>> for parameter 'crtc'
>>> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:1166: warning: No description found
>>> for parameter 'crtc'
>>> 
>>
>> I've now added htmldocs build to my pre-merge build testing so I'll hopefully
>> catch this earlier (no promises).
>
> Dear 0day folks, what's the status of 'make htmldocs' build testing on
> patches posted to dri-devel and intel-gfx mailing lists? I see
> occasional mails reporting issues in documentation, but sometimes there
> are no reports.
>
> And while I'm reaching out, have we ensured testing of the new repos and
> branches we have? There's the drm-misc and drm-tip repos. drm-tip is an
> integration tree, and other repos and branches feed to it. If you don't
> have anything such, we should probably discuss whether it's best to test
> the individual trees, or the integration tree, or both.

Okay, I see that you've sent reports about drm-tip, but there's nothing
on the drm-misc branches after it moved from drm-intel.git to a repo of
its own. Is drm-tip enough, or should we expand on drm-misc?

BR,
Jani.

>
>
> BR,
> Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center