[PATCH] drm-misc: Next phase in small drivers in drm-misc

[Daniel Vetter]

I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the
kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market
seems to work ok-ish too. I think we can try to make it (slowly) scale
to more drivers, with driver teams interested in being part of
drm-misc. I do think we need to be careful though, to make sure we
don't overstretch the review/mentoring bandwidth and can improve
process&tooling as we go.

Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal at linaro.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo at padovan.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>
Cc: Mark Yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drm-misc.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drm-misc.rst b/drm-misc.rst
index b6d01f2c7c2b..e4409cce8178 100644
--- a/drm-misc.rst
+++ b/drm-misc.rst
@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ Small Drivers
 =============
 
 Small drivers, where a full tree is overkill, can be maintained in drm-misc. For
-now it's just an experiment with a few drivers to figure out a working process.
-Slightly different rules apply:
+now there's just a few drivers maintained in drm-misc, but we can slowly add
+more to figure out how to make this scale. Slightly different rules apply:
 
 * Small is measured in patches merged per kernel release. The occasional big
   patch series is still acceptable if it's not a common thing (e.g. new hw
-- 
2.11.0