[PATCHv4 3/3] drm/vgem: Enable dmabuf import interfaces
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri May 5 07:02:35 UTC 2017
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:25:03PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:45:48AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >
> > Enable the GEM dma-buf import interfaces in addition to the export
> > interfaces. This lets vgem be used as a test source for other allocators
> > (e.g. Ion).
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v4: Use new drm_gem_prime_import_dev function
> > ---
> > static const struct vm_operations_struct vgem_gem_vm_ops = {
> > @@ -114,12 +142,8 @@ static void vgem_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> > kfree(vfile);
> > }
> >
> > -/* ioctls */
> > -
> > -static struct drm_gem_object *vgem_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> > - struct drm_file *file,
> > - unsigned int *handle,
> > - unsigned long size)
> > +static struct drm_vgem_gem_object *__vgem_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> > + unsigned long size)
>
> I'm going to guess that doesn't line up anymore. If checkpatch isn't
> complaining, then sorry for the noise.
>
> > +static struct drm_gem_object *vgem_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> > + struct drm_file *file,
> > + unsigned int *handle,
> > + unsigned long size)
>
> Ditto.
>
> Lgtm, so r-b still good.
I applied all three as-is, I think we can polish more as follow-ups.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list