[Bug 103804] igt/benchmark/gem_exec_nop does not permit to select execution ring

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103804

            Bug ID: 103804
           Summary: igt/benchmark/gem_exec_nop does not permit to select
                    execution ring
           Product: DRI
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: IGT
          Assignee: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: dmitry.v.rogozhkin at intel.com

Looking into the code igt/benchmark/gem_exec_nop should permit to select a RING
to load. However, this feature is not functional. For example, assuming that
i915 PMU patches https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/29735/ are applied
for the kernel, try:

# perf stat -e
i915/rcs0-busy/,i915/vcs0-busy/,i915/vcs1-busy/,i915/vecs0-busy/,i915/bcs0-busy/
-a ./gem_exec_nop -e rcs
  4.433

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

     2,002,891,967 ns   i915/rcs0-busy/
           280,244 ns   i915/vcs0-busy/
           118,222 ns   i915/vcs1-busy/
           361,440 ns   i915/vecs0-busy/
           365,253 ns   i915/bcs0-busy/

       3.033127723 seconds time elapsed

# perf stat -e
i915/rcs0-busy/,i915/vcs0-busy/,i915/vcs1-busy/,i915/vecs0-busy/,i915/bcs0-busy/
-a ./gem_exec_nop -e vcs
  4.531

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

     2,005,028,005 ns   i915/rcs0-busy/
           304,735 ns   i915/vcs0-busy/
           100,476 ns   i915/vcs1-busy/
           348,364 ns   i915/vecs0-busy/
           383,365 ns   i915/bcs0-busy/

       3.048972240 seconds time elapsed

# perf stat -e
i915/rcs0-busy/,i915/vcs0-busy/,i915/vcs1-busy/,i915/vecs0-busy/,i915/bcs0-busy/
-a ./gem_exec_nop -e bcs
  4.548

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

     2,003,302,067 ns   i915/rcs0-busy/
           229,991 ns   i915/vcs0-busy/
            50,410 ns   i915/vcs1-busy/
           249,257 ns   i915/vecs0-busy/
           267,072 ns   i915/bcs0-busy/

       3.050740036 seconds time elapsed

# perf stat -e
i915/rcs0-busy/,i915/vcs0-busy/,i915/vcs1-busy/,i915/vecs0-busy/,i915/bcs0-busy/
-a ./gem_exec_nop -e vecs
  4.547

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

     2,002,918,507 ns   i915/rcs0-busy/
           251,940 ns   i915/vcs0-busy/
           134,314 ns   i915/vcs1-busy/
           345,163 ns   i915/vecs0-busy/
           366,121 ns   i915/bcs0-busy/

       3.054508956 seconds time elapsed

# perf stat -e
i915/rcs0-busy/,i915/vcs0-busy/,i915/vcs1-busy/,i915/vecs0-busy/,i915/bcs0-busy/
-a ./gem_exec_nop -e all
  4.488

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

     2,004,461,103 ns   i915/rcs0-busy/
           194,267 ns   i915/vcs0-busy/
           104,581 ns   i915/vcs1-busy/
           306,019 ns   i915/vecs0-busy/
           291,113 ns   i915/bcs0-busy/

       3.061850018 seconds time elapsed

So, you see that the load goes always to rcs0. The reason seems to be the
commit:

commit 05ca171aa9a6902614241f9685de2f62f30126d8
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Fri Jun 3 10:43:09 2016 +0100

    benchmarks/gem_exec_nop: Extend submission to check write inter-engine sync

    Currently, we look at the throughput for submitting a read batch to a
    single engine or any. The kernel optimises for this by allowing multiple
    engine to read at the same time, but writes are exclusive to a single
    engine. So lets try to measure the impact of inserting the barriers
    between writes on different engines.

    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

which actually shadowed the RING parameter in the loop function:

static int loop(unsigned ring, int reps, int ncpus, unsigned flags) {

       all_nengine = 0;
        for (ring = 1; ring < 16; ring++) {
                execbuf.flags &= ~ENGINE_FLAGS;
                execbuf.flags |= ring;
                if (__gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf) == 0)
                        all_engines[all_nengine++] = ring;
        }

        if (ring == -1) {
                nengine = all_nengine;
                memcpy(engines, all_engines, all_nengine*sizeof(engines[0]));
        } else {
                nengine = 1;
                engines[0] = ring;
        }

}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20171117/fc1a9857/attachment.html>