[Bug 103697] [regression] shared memory size 64k -> 32k?

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103697

--- Comment #4 from O Heid <oliver.heid at h-next.de> ---
Many thanks for your consideration - That would be great!
Our application is real time image processing and display. The main computing
effort is delay-and-sum beamforming.
Source and destination data sets are much larger than LDS so we need to do
block processing. This causes additional LDS <-> GPURAM traffic essentially
inversely proportional to block (LDS) size. A 32k vs 64k limit (and thus twice
the RAM traffic) therefore causes quite a performance hit.
Anyway: Mesa's OpenGL performance on AMD Radeons is quite amazing. Great job!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20171128/1237a588/attachment.html>