[PATCH 00/12] of: overlay: clean up device tree overlay code
Frank Rowand
frowand.list at gmail.com
Fri Oct 13 22:03:22 UTC 2017
Hi Rob,
On 10/02/17 20:53, frowand.list at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand at sony.com>
>
> I have found the device tree overlay code to be difficult to read and
> maintain. This patch series attempts to improve that situation.
>
> The cleanup includes some changes visible to users of overlays. The
> only in kernel user of overlays is fixed up for those changes. The
> in kernel user is:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
>
> Following the cleanup patches are a set of patches to fix various
> issues.
>
> The first five patches are intended to not make any functional
> changes, and are segrated to ease review.
>
> Frank Rowand (12):
> of: overlay.c: Remove comments that state the obvious, to reduce
> clutter
> of: overlay.c: Convert comparisons to zero or NULL to logical
> expressions
> of: overlay: rename identifiers to more reflect what they do
> of: overlay: rename identifiers in dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop()
> of: overlay: minor restructuring
> of: overlay: detect cases where device tree may become corrupt
> of: overlay: expand check of whether overlay changeset can be removed
> of: overlay: loosen overly strict phandle clash check
> of: overlay: avoid race condition between applying multiple overlays
> of: overlay: simplify applying symbols from an overlay
> of: overlay: remove a dependency on device node full_name
> of: overlay: remove unneeded check for NULL kbasename()
>
> Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt | 12 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c | 15 +-
> drivers/of/base.c | 2 +-
> drivers/of/dynamic.c | 137 +++-
> drivers/of/of_private.h | 10 +-
> drivers/of/overlay.c | 1024 ++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 80 +-
> include/linux/of.h | 33 +-
> 8 files changed, 871 insertions(+), 442 deletions(-)
>
What is the status on this series? Did I resolve all of the issues that
you found? Is there anything else I need to do?
The last issue that I recall, was a question about "[PATCH 09/12] of: overlay:
avoid race condition between applying multiple overlays", were you asked if
of_resolve_phandles() could be moved into of_overlay_apply(). I sent an
additional patch "[PATCH] of: overlay: move resolve phandles into
of_overlay_apply()" [1] that applies on top of this series to do so.
There is a trickle of new patches against the same files as in my
series, so I would like to get my series applied sooner that later,
if possible.
Thanks,
Frank
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/10/1389
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list