[PATCHv2 1/2] dt-bindings: adi,adv7511.txt: document cec clock
Sergei Shtylyov
sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com
Tue Sep 19 12:27:09 UTC 2017
On 09/19/2017 01:59 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Document the cec clock binding.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com>
>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt | 4 ++++
>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt
>>>>>>>>> index 06668bca7ffc..4497ae054d49 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt
>>>>>>>>> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ Optional properties:
>>>>>>>>> - adi,disable-timing-generator: Only for ADV7533. Disables the internal timing
>>>>>>>>> generator. The chip will rely on the sync signals in the DSI data lanes,
>>>>>>>>> rather than generate its own timings for HDMI output.
>>>>>>>>> +- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to CEC clock.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called "phandle" in the DT speak. :-)
>>>>>>>> Are you sure the clock specifier would always be absent?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry? I don't understand the question. Did you mean: "can be absent?"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you only say that there'll be the clock phandle only. The clock
>>>>>> specifier may follow the phandle for the clock devices that have
>>>>>> "#clock-cells" prop != 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have to say that I just copy-and-pasted this from other bindings.
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Would this be better?
>>>>>
>>>>> - clocks: list of clock specifiers, corresponding to entries in
>>>>> the clock-names property;
>>>>
>>>> Didn't you say that there'll be only one clock, "cec"? If so, there's
>>>> gonna be a single clock phandle+specifier pair. They always go in pairs. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> - clock-names: from common clock binding: must be "cec".
>>>
>>> - clocks: cec clock phandle, corresponding to the clock-names entry.
>>
>> The clock phandle and specifier.
>>
>>> - clock-names: from common clock binding: must be "cec".
>>>
>>> This OK?
>>
>> Well, you seem to be going in circles, the above was almost the same as
>> the original prop description...
>
> - clocks: from common clock binding: reference to the CEC clock.
> - clock-names: from common clock binding: must be "cec".
>
> This avoids the whole issue of having just a phandle or a phandle + specifier.
OK, let's go with this one. Thank you!
> Regards,
>
> Hans
MBR, Sergei
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list