[PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Document THC63LVD1024 LVDS decoder
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Apr 9 10:22:44 UTC 2018
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:40:14PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Friday, 6 April 2018 17:25:58 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Same on the mandatory/optional VCC supply thing. Let's try to make
> > next version the final one. If the optional property with the dummy
> > regulator doesn't satisfy you and it is preferred to have a fixed-regulator
> > anyhow in DT I'll do in next version, othewise let's try not to change
> > it again. I'll just remark here that in the current Eagle design vcc is
> > connected to a power rail with no regulator at all :)
> I don't like the dummy regulator much, as it generates a dev_warn(), which
> makes me believe that it's a hack rather than a proper solution. You might
> want to ask Mark Brown for his opinion.
The DT should describe the physical supplies the device needs, if that's
a fixed regulator with no software control then the DT should have a
fixed regulator with no software control.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the dri-devel