[PATCH 5/7] omapfb: omapfb_dss.h: add stubs to build with COMPILE_TEST && DRM_OMAP
Tomi Valkeinen
tomi.valkeinen at ti.com
Wed Apr 25 06:24:14 UTC 2018
On 23/04/18 23:09, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> I don't think it's worth it renaming the common symbols. They will change over
>> time as omapdrm is under heavy rework, and it's painful enough without having
>> to handle cross-tree changes.
>
> It could just rename the namespace-conflicting FB_OMAP2 functions,
> keeping the DRM ones as-is.
Yes, I'm fine with renaming omapfb functions if that helps. But still,
if omapdrm is enabled in the kernel as module or built-in, omapfb will
not work. So even if we get them to compile and link, it'll break at
runtime one way or another.
>> Let's just live with the fact that both drivers
>> can't be compiled at the same time, given that omapfb is deprecated.
>
> IMO, a driver that it is deprecated, being in a state where it
> conflicts with a non-deprecated driver that is under heavy rework
> is a very good candidate to go to drivers/staging or even to /dev/null.
The problem is that it supports old devices which are not supported by
omapdrm. But both omapfb and omapdrm support many of the same devices.
Tomi
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list