[PATCH] drm/scheduler: Remove entity->rq NULL check
Andrey Grodzovsky
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Fri Aug 10 13:44:08 UTC 2018
I can take care of this.
Andrey
On 08/10/2018 09:27 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Crap, yeah indeed that needs to be protected by some lock.
>
> Going to prepare a patch for that,
> Christian.
>
> Am 09.08.2018 um 21:49 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>>
>>
>> But I still have questions about entity->last_user (didn't notice
>> this before) -
>>
>> Looks to me there is a race condition with it's current usage, let's
>> say process A was preempted after doing
>> drm_sched_entity_flush->cmpxchg(...)
>>
>> now process B working on same entity (forked) is inside
>> drm_sched_entity_push_job, he writes his PID to entity->last_user and
>> also
>>
>> executes drm_sched_rq_add_entity. Now process A runs again and
>> execute drm_sched_rq_remove_entity inadvertently causing process B
>> removal
>>
>> from it's scheduler rq.
>>
>> Looks to me like instead we should lock together entity->last_user
>> accesses and adds/removals of entity to the rq.
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>>
>> On 08/06/2018 10:18 AM, Nayan Deshmukh wrote:
>>> I forgot about this since we started discussing possible scenarios
>>> of processes and threads.
>>>
>>> In any case, this check is redundant. Acked-by: Nayan Deshmukh
>>> <nayan26deshmukh at gmail.com <mailto:nayan26deshmukh at gmail.com>>
>>>
>>> Nayan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:43 PM Christian König
>>> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping. Any objections to that?
>>>
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>> Am 03.08.2018 um 13:08 schrieb Christian König:
>>> > That is superflous now.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com
>>> <mailto:christian.koenig at amd.com>>
>>> > ---
>>> > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c | 5 -----
>>> > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
>>> > index 85908c7f913e..65078dd3c82c 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
>>> > @@ -590,11 +590,6 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct
>>> drm_sched_job *sched_job,
>>> > if (first) {
>>> > /* Add the entity to the run queue */
>>> > spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
>>> > - if (!entity->rq) {
>>> > - DRM_ERROR("Trying to push to a killed
>>> entity\n");
>>> > - spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
>>> > - return;
>>> > - }
>>> > drm_sched_rq_add_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> > spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
>>> > drm_sched_wakeup(entity->rq->sched);
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20180810/9eef6636/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list