[PATCH] drm/panel: sn65dsi86: Implement AUX channel

Sean Paul seanpaul at chromium.org
Fri Aug 10 15:23:33 UTC 2018


On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:22:58AM +0530, spanda at codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> 
> Thanks for your patch.
> I also made this similar change as part of my PSR support changes (yet to be
> posted for review). But since this patch is posted now, i will pick this for
> my PSR changes.

Hi Sandeep,
Thanks so much for your review. I didn't realize you were working on PSR, that's
cool.

I've added a few comments below, and I'll upload a v2 shortly.

> 
> On 2018-08-09 03:23, Sean Paul wrote:
> > This was hand-rolled in the first version, and will surely be useful as
> > we expand the driver to support more varied use cases.
> > 
> > Cc: Sandeep Panda <spanda at codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 1b6e8b72be58..50aa8c3c39fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@
> >  #include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> > +#include <drm/drm_dp_helper.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_of.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> >  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > @@ -29,12 +31,15 @@
> >  #define SN_DATARATE_CONFIG_REG			0x94
> >  #define SN_PLL_ENABLE_REG			0x0D
> >  #define SN_SCRAMBLE_CONFIG_REG			0x95
> > -#define SN_AUX_WDATA0_REG			0x64
> > +#define SN_AUX_WDATA_REG(x)			(0x64 + x)
> >  #define SN_AUX_ADDR_19_16_REG			0x74
> >  #define SN_AUX_ADDR_15_8_REG			0x75
> >  #define SN_AUX_ADDR_7_0_REG			0x76
> >  #define SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG			0x77
> >  #define SN_AUX_CMD_REG				0x78
> > +#define  AUX_CMD_SEND				0x01
> > +#define  AUX_CMD_REQ(x)				(x << 4)
> > +#define SN_AUX_RDATA_REG(x)			(0x79 + x)
> >  #define SN_ML_TX_MODE_REG			0x96
> >  /* video config specific registers */
> >  #define SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_LOW_REG	0x20
> > @@ -64,6 +69,9 @@
> >  #define SN_DP_DATA_RATE_OFFSET	5
> >  #define SN_SYNC_POLARITY_OFFSET	7
> > 
> > +/* Matches DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES (for now) */
> > +#define SN_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES	16
> > +
> >  #define SN_ENABLE_VID_STREAM_BIT	BIT(3)
> >  #define SN_REFCLK_FREQ_BITS		GENMASK(3, 1)
> >  #define SN_DSIA_NUM_LANES_BITS		GENMASK(4, 3)
> > @@ -76,6 +84,7 @@
> >  struct ti_sn_bridge {
> >  	struct device			*dev;
> >  	struct regmap			*regmap;
> > +	struct drm_dp_aux		aux;
> >  	struct drm_bridge		bridge;
> >  	struct drm_connector		connector;
> >  	struct device_node		*host_node;
> > @@ -473,12 +482,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge
> > *bridge)
> >  	 * authentication method. We need to enable this method in the eDP
> > panel
> >  	 * at DisplayPort address 0x0010A prior to link training.
> >  	 */
> > -	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_WDATA0_REG, 0x01);
> > -	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_19_16_REG, 0x00);
> > -	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_15_8_REG, 0x01);
> > -	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_7_0_REG, 0x0A);
> > -	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG, 0x01);
> > -	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, 0x81);
> > +	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_CONFIGURATION_SET, 0);
> 
> I think the last argument here should be 0x1 instead of 0. or better put it
> as DP_ALTERNATE_SCRAMBLER_RESET_ENABLE.

Ah shoot, good catch, not sure what I was thinking.

> 
> >  	usleep_range(10000, 10500); /* 10ms delay recommended by spec */
> 
> >  We can remove this usleep now, as you are already ensuring in the newly
> > added function that aux transaction is successful.
> 
> >  	/* Semi auto link training mode */
> > @@ -527,6 +531,90 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs
> > ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
> >  	.post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
> >  };
> > 
> > +static struct ti_sn_bridge *aux_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > +{
> > +	return container_of(aux, struct ti_sn_bridge, aux);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool ti_sn_cmd_done(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	unsigned int val;
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, &val);
> 
> Can we read back register offset 0xF4, instead of 0x78, to check if AUX
> transaction was success or any error has occurred.

I think we should continue to read the SEND bit here. The interrupt in F4 is
really just tracking SEND, so best to check at the source.

I will add a check for some of the error bits in 0xF4 in transfer after the
poll to ensure everything succeeded.

> 
> > +	WARN_ON(ret);
> > +	return ret || !(val & AUX_CMD_SEND);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t ti_sn_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> > +				  struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> > +{
> > +	struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = aux_to_ti_sn_bridge(aux);
> > +	u32 request = msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> > +	u32 request_val = AUX_CMD_REQ(msg->request);
> > +	u8 *buf = (u8 *)msg->buffer;
> > +	bool cmd_done;
> > +	int ret, i;
> > +
> > +	if (msg->size > SN_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	switch (request) {
> > +	case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
> > +	case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
> > +	case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
> > +	case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
> > +		regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, request_val);
> 
> This regmap_write is not needed since you will be writing it again towards
> the end of this function.

Yeah, I noticed you were doing this earlier. The programming guide in 8.4.5.2.1
(gosh those sub-sections are atrocious) suggests updating CMD_REG before
programming ADDR and LENGTH, so I've done that out of an abundance of caution.
We need this switch anyways, so it's not hurting us.

> 
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_19_16_REG,
> > +		     (msg->address >> 16) & 0xFF);
> 
> Since we are only concerned about 4 bits (bit 16-19) better to & with 0xF
> instead of 0xFF

Makes sense, will do.

> 
> > +	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_15_8_REG,
> > +		     (msg->address >> 8) & 0xFF);
> > +	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_ADDR_7_0_REG, msg->address & 0xFF);
> > +
> > +	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG, msg->size);
> > +
> > +	if (request == DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE || request == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE) {
> > +		for (i = 0; i < msg->size; i++)
> > +			regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_WDATA_REG(i),
> > +				     buf[i]);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, request_val |
> > AUX_CMD_SEND);
> > +
> > +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ti_sn_cmd_done, pdata, cmd_done, cmd_done,
> > +				 200, 50 * 1000);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (request == DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ || request == DP_AUX_I2C_READ) {
> > +		unsigned int val;
> > +
> > +		ret = regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG, &val);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +		else if (val != msg->size)
> > +			return -ENXIO;
> > +
> > +		for (i = 0; i < msg->size; i++) {
> > +			unsigned int val;
> > +			ret = regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_RDATA_REG(i),
> > +					  &val);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +
> > +			WARN_ON(val & ~0xFF);
> > +			buf[i] = (u8)(val & 0xFF);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return msg->size;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *np = pdata->dev->of_node;
> > @@ -606,6 +694,11 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client
> > *client,
> > 
> >  	i2c_set_clientdata(client, pdata);
> > 
> > +	pdata->aux.name = "ti-sn65dsi86-aux";
> > +	pdata->aux.dev = pdata->dev;
> > +	pdata->aux.transfer = ti_sn_aux_transfer;
> > +	drm_dp_aux_register(&pdata->aux);
> > +
> >  	pdata->bridge.funcs = &ti_sn_bridge_funcs;
> >  	pdata->bridge.of_node = client->dev.of_node;

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS


More information about the dri-devel mailing list