[PATCH 2/2] drm/ttm: Use pr_debug for all output from ttm_bo_evict
Michel Dänzer
michel at daenzer.net
Thu Dec 6 09:38:40 UTC 2018
On 2018-12-06 10:33 a.m., Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 06.12.18 um 10:09 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2018-12-06 3:43 a.m., Zhang, Jerry(Junwei) wrote:
>>> On 12/6/18 12:56 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> All the output is related, so it should all be printed the same way.
>>>> Some of it was using pr_debug, but some of it appeared in dmesg by
>>>> default. The caller should handle failure, so there's no need to spam
>>>> dmesg with potentially quite a lot of output by default.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
>>> Sounds reasonable, but personally prefer to show error when some
>>> vital incident happens, e.g. no memory on eviction.
>> The amdgpu driver still prints these in that case:
>>
>> [drm:amdgpu_cs_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* amdgpu_cs_list_validate(validated) failed.
>> [drm:amdgpu_cs_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Not enough memory for command submission!
>>
>> That's plenty as far as I'm concerned. :)
>
> Yeah, but in this case I would rather make the amdgpu messages debug
> level and leave the TTM meassages on error level.
That makes no sense to me.
The amdgpu messages have some value for normal users / bug reports,
indicating that something isn't going quite as planned.
The TTM messages are orders of magnitude longer, and are basically noise
for a normal user.
Seems like a no-brainer to me which of these should be visible by default.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list