[PATCH RFC 3/9] drm/omap: Add ovl_name() and mgr_name() to dispc_ops
Tomi Valkeinen
tomi.valkeinen at ti.com
Wed Feb 28 14:05:34 UTC 2018
On 28/02/18 15:23, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 13:37:48 EET Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 27/02/18 16:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> the whole omap_irq_fifo_underflow() and omap_irq_ocp_error_handler() IRQ
>>> handling to the DSS side, as they're not DRM/KMS-related ?
>>
>> I think we should react to both errors somehow (I'm not sure how,
>> disable output probably), and that has to be done on the KMS level. We
>> don't do that now, but moving this to DSS side would make error handling
>> more difficult to do in the future.
>
> Ideally I'd demultiplex interrupts on the DSS side and report events to the
> KMS side (page flip completion, underflows, ...).
That's more or less what Jyri's "drm/omap: Make omapdss API more
generic" does, isn't it? Or what is the difference with interrupt and
event in your mind? Function calls vs status bits?
Tomi
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list