[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the audio component binding more generic

[Takashi Iwai]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:05:45 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> On 7/19/18 12:50 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:54:35 +0200,
> > Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/17/2018 04:26 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> this is a preliminiary patch set to convert the existing i915 /
> >>> HD-audio component binding to be applicable to other drivers like
> >>> radeon / amdgpu.  This patchset itself doesn't change the
> >>> functionality but only renames and split to a new drm_audio_component
> >>> stuff from i915_audio_component.
> >>>
> >>> The actual usage of the new API will follow once after this one gets
> >>> reviewed / accepted.  The whole patches (including this patchset) are
> >>> found in topic/hda-acomp branch of sound.git tree.
> >>>
> >>> BTW, since the whole stuff is about the audio binding, I suppose these
> >>> will go through sound git tree.  Let me know if anyone has concerns.
> >> No objections but a slight concern that this will conflict with the
> >> HDAudio+DSP patches that I was about to resubmit on top of your
> >> topic/hda-core-intel branch. the two series touch the same files so
> >> it'd be a miracle if there is no issue.
> >> How do you want to deal with this?
> >
> > Does it conflict severely?  If it's trivial, it can be resolved at
> > merge time, too.  The changes in my patchset are fairly trivial, so it
> > shouldn't be too hard.
> 
> I was able to make things work by taking your topic/hda-core-intel,
> merge it on Mark's for-next, then add my additional changes and these
> DRM changes. The last two can be done in any order. But I am getting
> some conflicts if I try to apply these DRM changes first, not sure why
> git is complaining though, the changes look trivial enough.
> So yes it looks possible to deal with the two series in parallel, will
> send my update later today.

OK, since my changes are relatively trivial to deal with, I merge the
changes to for-next branch now.

If your patches can be respinned, maybe it's easier to be rebased on
top of these merges.

Mark, could you merge topic/drm_audio_component branch into yours, if
Pierre's patchset won't go in immediately?  It's an immutable branch,
including already topic/hda-core-intel in itself.


thanks,

Takashi