[DPU PATCH 2/7] drm/msm/dpu: clean up dpu plane custom properties
Sean Paul
seanpaul at chromium.org
Mon Jun 4 19:53:15 UTC 2018
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:30:57PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> This change removes all the dpu plane custom properties
> and its handlers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 8 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_ad4.h | 99 --
> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_color_processing.c | 1521 --------------------
> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_color_processing.h | 120 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c | 148 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 2 -
> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ad4.c | 1443 -------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 72 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 89 --
> .../msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_proc_common_v4.h | 69 -
> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_proc_v4.c | 242 ----
> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_proc_v4.h | 40 -
> .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_processing.h | 20 -
> .../msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_processing_v1_7.c | 565 --------
> .../msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_processing_v1_7.h | 92 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c | 44 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h | 15 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dspp.c | 209 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dspp.h | 220 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_lm.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h | 44 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_pingpong.c | 68 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_pingpong.h | 6 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1.c | 757 ----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1.h | 27 -
> .../msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1_color_proc.c | 943 ------------
> .../msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1_color_proc.h | 75 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c | 219 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h | 73 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_util.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_util.h | 156 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 3 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 1267 +---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.h | 31 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_reg_dma.c | 139 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_reg_dma.h | 310 ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c | 102 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_wb.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 28 -
> include/uapi/drm/dpu_drm.h | 187 ---
> include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h | 1 -
> 45 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 9189 deletions(-)
Doing all of this at once is really hard to review. I would have preferred to
review each feature removal in a separate patch. However, since this is just
going to be squashed into the DPU megapatch anyways, I guess it's fine.
I only paid close attention to the additions, there are some unrelated
whitespace changes, but also meh on account of the squash (and non seem
objectionable).
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_ad4.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_color_processing.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_color_processing.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ad4.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_proc_common_v4.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_proc_v4.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_proc_v4.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_processing.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_processing_v1_7.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_color_processing_v1_7.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dspp.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dspp.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1_color_proc.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_reg_dma_v1_color_proc.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_reg_dma.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_reg_dma.h
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 3c00040..1f23c66 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ HOST_LFS_LIBS := $(shell getconf LFS_LIBS)
> HOSTCC = gcc
> HOSTCXX = g++
> HOSTCFLAGS := -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 \
> - -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 $(HOST_LFS_CFLAGS)
> + -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 -Wmaybe-uninitialized $(HOST_LFS_CFLAGS)
What's up with the compiler flag warnings? Seems unrelated (and we should
probably remove all of them in a separate patch anyways).
> HOSTCXXFLAGS := -O2 $(HOST_LFS_CFLAGS)
> HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS)
> HOST_LOADLIBES := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS)
/snip
> index 48920b05..d439a9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/ktime.h>
> -#include <uapi/drm/dpu_drm.h>
> #include <drm/drm_mode.h>
> #include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> @@ -31,13 +30,18 @@
> #include "dpu_hw_ctl.h"
> #include "dpu_crtc.h"
> #include "dpu_plane.h"
> -#include "dpu_color_processing.h"
> #include "dpu_encoder.h"
> #include "dpu_vbif.h"
> #include "dpu_power_handle.h"
> #include "dpu_core_perf.h"
> #include "dpu_trace.h"
>
> +#define DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_NOT_DEFINED 0
> +#define DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_OPAQUE 1
> +#define DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_PREMULTIPLIED 2
> +#define DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_COVERAGE 3
> +#define DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_MAX 4
> +
> /* layer mixer index on dpu_crtc */
> #define LEFT_MIXER 0
> #define RIGHT_MIXER 1
> @@ -590,7 +594,6 @@ static void dpu_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> if (dpu_crtc->blob_info)
> drm_property_blob_put(dpu_crtc->blob_info);
> msm_property_destroy(&dpu_crtc->property_info);
> - dpu_cp_crtc_destroy_properties(crtc);
> _dpu_crtc_destroy_dest_scaler(dpu_crtc);
>
> _dpu_crtc_deinit_events(dpu_crtc);
> @@ -624,15 +627,11 @@ static void _dpu_crtc_setup_blend_cfg(struct dpu_crtc_mixer *mixer,
> struct dpu_hw_mixer *lm = mixer->hw_lm;
>
> /* default to opaque blending */
> - fg_alpha = dpu_plane_get_property(pstate, PLANE_PROP_ALPHA);
> + fg_alpha = 0XFF;
> bg_alpha = 0xFF - fg_alpha;
This goes to 0 and the fg_alpha != 0xff checks are always false. So let's clean
the rest of the function to remove the dead code and variables.
> - blend_op = DPU_BLEND_FG_ALPHA_FG_CONST | DPU_BLEND_BG_ALPHA_BG_CONST;
> - blend_type = dpu_plane_get_property(pstate, PLANE_PROP_BLEND_OP);
> -
> - DPU_DEBUG("blend type:0x%x blend alpha:0x%x\n", blend_type, fg_alpha);
> + blend_type = DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_OPAQUE;
>
> switch (blend_type) {
> -
> case DPU_DRM_BLEND_OP_OPAQUE:
> blend_op = DPU_BLEND_FG_ALPHA_FG_CONST |
> DPU_BLEND_BG_ALPHA_BG_CONST;
>
/snip
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list