[PATCH v2 0/7] Modernize vga_switcheroo by using device link for HDA

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:55:50PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:54:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 10:53:24AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > > Modernize vga_switcheroo by using a device link to enforce a runtime PM
> > > > > dependency from an HDA controller to the GPU it's integrated into, v2.
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://github.com/l1k/linux/commits/switcheroo_devlink_v2
> > >
> > > Patches [3/7] to [7/7] were reviewed by Peter Wu, the HDA bits in
> > > patch [5/7] additionally by Takashi.
> > > 
> > > Patch [2/7] was acked by Bjorn.  There was no ack for patch [1/7]
> > > (authored by Rafael), but it adressed the objection Bjorn raised
> > > against my original patch, so I'm assuming Bjorn is okay with it.
> > > (Bjorn, please let me know if that isn't the case.)
> > > 
> > > If there are no objections, I plan to push the series to
> > > drm-misc-next by the middle of the coming week so that it
> > > would still catch the last train to 4.17.
> > 
> > Please make sure all maintainers of other bits are ok with that and have
> > given their formal ack for merging through drm-misc.
> 
> Oh, I had thought Bjorn's acks for patches [2/7] and [5/7] and
> Takashi's reviewed-by for the HDA-related patches were sufficient.

There's a huge confusion around acked-by "I think this looks reasonable",
acked-by "this is reviewed but I don't feel like a full review tag" and
acked-by "for merging through some other tree" and a few other meanings.
Always good to double-check :-)
-Daniel

> 
> Bjorn, Takashi, any objections against merging this through drm-misc?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lukas

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch