[PATCH v3 2/2] drm/nouveau: tegra: Detach from ARM DMA/IOMMU mapping

[Thierry Reding]

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 30/05/18 09:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> > 
> > Depending on the kernel configuration, early ARM architecture setup code
> > may have attached the GPU to a DMA/IOMMU mapping that transparently uses
> > the IOMMU to back the DMA API. Tegra requires special handling for IOMMU
> > backed buffers (a special bit in the GPU's MMU page tables indicates the
> > memory path to take: via the SMMU or directly to the memory controller).
> > Transparently backing DMA memory with an IOMMU prevents Nouveau from
> > properly handling such memory accesses and causes memory access faults.
> > 
> > As a side-note: buffers other than those allocated in instance memory
> > don't need to be physically contiguous from the GPU's perspective since
> > the GPU can map them into contiguous buffers using its own MMU. Mapping
> > these buffers through the IOMMU is unnecessary and will even lead to
> > performance degradation because of the additional translation. One
> > exception to this are compressible buffers which need large pages. In
> > order to enable these large pages, multiple small pages will have to be
> > combined into one large (I/O virtually contiguous) mapping via the
> > IOMMU. However, that is a topic outside the scope of this fix and isn't
> > currently supported. An implementation will want to explicitly create
> > these large pages in the Nouveau driver, so detaching from a DMA/IOMMU
> > mapping would still be required.
> 
> I wonder if it might make sense to have a hook in iommu_attach_device() to
> notify the arch DMA API code when moving devices between unmanaged and DMA
> ops domains? That seems like it might be the most low-impact way to address
> the overall problem long-term.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - clarify the use of IOMMU mapping for compressible buffers
> > - squash multiple patches into this
> > 
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c | 5 +++++
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c
> > index 78597da6313a..d0538af1b967 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c
> > @@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ nvkm_device_tegra_probe_iommu(struct nvkm_device_tegra *tdev)
> >   	unsigned long pgsize_bitmap;
> >   	int ret;
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)
> 
> Wouldn't CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU be even more appropriate?

Not necessarily. arm_dma_iommu_detach_device() is always defined on ARM,
only with CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU=n it will be empty. So this check is
a guard to make sure we don't call the function when it isn't available,
but it may still not do anything.

> 
> > +	/* make sure we can use the IOMMU exclusively */
> > +	arm_dma_iommu_detach_device(dev);
> 
> As before, I would just use the existing infrastructure the same way the
> Exynos DRM driver currently does in __exynos_iommu_attach() (albeit without
> then reattaching to another DMA ops mapping).

That's pretty much what I initially did and which was shot down by
Christoph. As I said earlier, at this point I don't really care what
color the shed will be. Can you and Christoph come to an agreement
on what it should be?

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20180530/b6e5bbcc/attachment-0001.sig>