[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: imx6sx: Add DISPLAY power domain support

[Leonard Crestez]

On 10/31/2018 5:06 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:17:50PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>> On 10/31/2018 8:12 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:23PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>>>> This was implemented in the driver but not actually defined and
>>>> referenced in dts. This makes it always on.
>>>>
>>>>   From reference manual in section "10.4.1.4.1 Power Distribution":
>>>>
>>>> "Display domain - The DISPLAY domain contains GIS, CSI, PXP, LCDIF,
>>>> PCIe, DCIC, and LDB. It is supplied by internal regulator."
>>>>
>>>> The current pd_pcie is actually only for PCIE_PHY, the PCIE ip block is
>>>> actually inside the DISPLAY domain. Handle this by adding the pcie node
>>>> in both power domains.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez at nxp.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>> As mentioned in the cover letter this requires multi-PD support in
>> imx-pci to be implemented, specifically PATCH 3/4 of this series:
>>
>> Unless that also gets merged soon via pci I expect issues in linux-next.
> 
> I do not know what you mean by "issues in linux-next" (I assume you mean
> when Shawn sends the patches to linux-next in preparation for v4.21); we
> have not planned any other PCI pull request for v4.20-rc1 material.

Yes my concern is linux-next for 4.21

>> The patch already has reviewed-by tags so "merging it soon" is not
>> unreasonable.
> 
> I can ACK it if Shawn wants to pull it, it may take a while to see it
> in -next if it has to go through the PCI tree, I think it is better
> to queue the series without splitting the patches across multiple
> channels though.

This sounds great to me, merging the whole series through Shawn's imx 
tree would prevent issues in linux-next or possible bisect failures in 4.21.