[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Nov 7 21:59:39 UTC 2018
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:39:57PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 16:23 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 21:59 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:21:14PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
> > > >
> > > > /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> > > > * topology_state->avail_slots as the port may not exist if the parent
> > > > * branch device was unplugged. This should be fixed by tracking
> > > > * per-port slot allocation in drm_dp_mst_topology_state instead of
> > > > * depending on the caller to tell us how many slots to release.
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > That's not the only reason we should fix this: forcing the driver to
> > > > track the VCPI allocations throughout a state's atomic check is
> > > > error prone, because it means that extra care has to be taken with the
> > > > order that drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() and
> > > > drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() are called in in order to ensure
> > > > idempotency. Currently the only driver actually using these helpers,
> > > > i915, doesn't even do this correctly: multiple ->best_encoder() checks
> > > > with i915's current implementation would not be idempotent and would
> > > > over-allocate VCPI slots, something I learned trying to implement
> > > > fallback retraining in MST.
> > > >
> > > > So: simplify this whole mess, and teach drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots()
> > > > and drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() to track the VCPI allocations for
> > > > each port. This allows us to ensure idempotency without having to rely
> > > > on the driver as much. Additionally: the driver doesn't need to do any
> > > > kind of VCPI slot tracking anymore if it doesn't need it for it's own
> > > > internal state.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally; this adds a new drm_dp_mst_atomic_check() helper which
> > > > must be used by atomic drivers to perform validity checks for the new
> > > > VCPI allocations incurred by a state.
> > > >
> > > > Also: update the documentation and make it more obvious that these
> > > > /must/ be called by /all/ atomic drivers supporting MST.
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v2:
> > > > - Use kmemdup() for duplicating MST state - danvet
> > > > - Move port validation out of duplicate state callback - danvet
> > > > - Handle looping through MST topology states in
> > > > drm_dp_mst_atomic_check() so the driver doesn't have to do it
> > > > - Fix documentation in drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots()
> > > > - Move the atomic check for each individual topology state into it's
> > > > own function, reduces indenting
> > > > - Don't consider "stale" MST ports when calculating the bandwidth
> > > > requirements. This is needed because originally we relied on the
> > > > state duplication functions to prune any stale ports from the new
> > > > state, which would prevent us from incorrectly considering their
> > > > bandwidth requirements alongside legitimate new payloads.
> > > > - Add function references in drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() -
> > > > danvet
> > > > - Annotate atomic VCPI and atomic check functions with __must_check
> > > > - danvet
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v1:
> > > > - Don't use the now-removed ->atomic_check() for private objects hook,
> > > > just give drivers a function to call themselves
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 31 ++--
> > > > include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 23 ++-
> > > > 4 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > > index 8c3cfac437f4..74823afb262e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > > @@ -2614,21 +2614,34 @@ static int drm_dp_init_vcpi(struct
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > - * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() - Find and add vcpi slots to the
> > > > state
> > > > + * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() - Find and add VCPI slots to the
> > > > state
> > > > * @state: global atomic state
> > > > * @mgr: MST topology manager for the port
> > > > * @port: port to find vcpi slots for
> > > > * @pbn: bandwidth required for the mode in PBN
> > > > *
> > > > - * RETURNS:
> > > > - * Total slots in the atomic state assigned for this port or error
> > > > + * Allocates VCPI slots to @port, replacing any previous VCPI
> > > > allocations
> > > > it
> > > > + * may have had. Any atomic drivers which support MST must call this
> > > > function
> > > > + * in their &drm_encoder_helper_funcs.atomic_check() callback to change
> > > > the
> > > > + * current VCPI allocation for the new state. The allocations are not
> > > > checked
> > > > + * against the bandwidth restraints of @mgr until the driver calls
> > > > + * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check().
> > > > + *
> > > > + * See also:
> > > > + * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()
> > > > + * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Returns:
> > > > + * Total slots in the atomic state assigned for this port, or a
> > > > negative
> > > > error
> > > > + * code if the port no longer exists
> > > > */
> > > > int drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, int pbn)
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
> > > > - int req_slots;
> > > > + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *pos, *vcpi = NULL;
> > > > + int prev_slots, req_slots, ret;
> > > >
> > > > topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
> > > > @@ -2637,20 +2650,41 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots(struct
> > > > drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > port = drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, port);
> > > > if (port == NULL)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > - req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div);
> > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("vcpi slots req=%d, avail=%d\n",
> > > > - req_slots, topology_state->avail_slots);
> > > >
> > > > - if (req_slots > topology_state->avail_slots) {
> > > > - drm_dp_put_port(port);
> > > > - return -ENOSPC;
> > > > + /* Find the current allocation for this port, if any */
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(pos, &topology_state->vcpis, next) {
> > > > + if (pos->port == port) {
> > > > + vcpi = pos;
> > > > + prev_slots = vcpi->vcpi;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > + if (!vcpi)
> > > > + prev_slots = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div);
> > > >
> > > > - topology_state->avail_slots -= req_slots;
> > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("vcpi slots avail=%d", topology_state->avail_slots);
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] [MST PORT:%p] vcpi %d -> %d\n",
> > > > + port->connector->base.id, port->connector->name, port,
> > > > + prev_slots, req_slots);
> > > >
> > > > + /* Add the new allocation to the state */
> > > > + if (!vcpi) {
> > > > + vcpi = kzalloc(sizeof(*vcpi), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!vcpi) {
> > > > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + vcpi->port = port;
> > > > + list_add(&vcpi->next, &topology_state->vcpis);
> > > > + }
> > > > + vcpi->vcpi = req_slots;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = req_slots;
> > > > +out:
> > > > drm_dp_put_port(port);
> > > > - return req_slots;
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -2658,32 +2692,50 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots);
> > > > * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() - Release allocated vcpi slots
> > > > * @state: global atomic state
> > > > * @mgr: MST topology manager for the port
> > > > - * @slots: number of vcpi slots to release
> > > > + * @port: The port to release the VCPI slots from
> > > > *
> > > > - * RETURNS:
> > > > - * 0 if @slots were added back to &drm_dp_mst_topology_state-
> > > avail_slots
> > > > or
> > > > - * negative error code
> > > > + * Releases any VCPI slots that have been allocated to a port in the
> > > > atomic
> > > > + * state. Any atomic drivers which support MST must call this function
> > > > in
> > > > + * their &drm_connector_helper_funcs.atomic_check() callback when the
> > > > + * connector will no longer have VCPI allocated (e.g. because it's CRTC
> > > > was
> > > > + * removed).
> > > > + *
> > > > + * It is OK to call this even if @port has been removed from the
> > > > system,
> > > > in
> > > > + * which case it will just amount to a no-op.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * See also:
> > > > + * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots()
> > > > + * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Returns:
> > > > + * 0 if all slots for this port were added back to
> > > > + * &drm_dp_mst_topology_state.avail_slots or negative error code
> > > > */
> > > > int drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > - int slots)
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
> > > > + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *tmp, *pos;
> > > >
> > > > topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
> > > > return PTR_ERR(topology_state);
> > > >
> > > > - /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> > > > - * topology_state->avail_slots as the port may not exist if the parent
> > > > - * branch device was unplugged. This should be fixed by tracking
> > > > - * per-port slot allocation in drm_dp_mst_topology_state instead of
> > > > - * depending on the caller to tell us how many slots to release.
> > > > - */
> > > > - topology_state->avail_slots += slots;
> > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("vcpi slots released=%d, avail=%d\n",
> > > > - slots, topology_state->avail_slots);
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &topology_state->vcpis, next) {
> > > > + if (pos->port == port) {
> > > > + list_del(&pos->next);
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[MST PORT:%p] vcpi %d -> 0\n",
> > > > + port, pos->vcpi);
> > > >
> > > > + kfree(pos);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* If no allocation was found, all that means is that the port was
> > > > + * destroyed since the last atomic commit. That's OK!
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > This case here has me a bit worried. I thought with your changes we'll
> > > always have the port pointer still around, to be able to clean things up
> > > properly. If this is not the case then we'd potentially leak the vcpi
> > > allocation for an unplugged port.
> > >
> > > Otoh if the driver releases the allocation for a port twice it's probably
> > > mixed up it's own book-keeping. We should WARN about that case.
> > >
> > > This is kinda fallout from your change to not prune allocations on
> > > duplicate, and I think will further clean up how this is handled.
> > >
> > > So with the comment removed and replaced by a WARNING(1,"no vcpi
> > > allocation found for port %p\n", port) or something like that this should
> > > be solid.
> >
> > Hm; that comment is leftover from the fallout of moving the port
> > verification
> > logic out of the state duplicate functions, but I don't think this would
> > nessecarily be a bookkeeping error. If we're going to support fallback
> > link retraining, we'll need to make sure that every driver's
> > drm_connector->atomic_check() function is idempotent so that if the
> > atomic helpers have to pull in more CRTCs to perform modesets on then
> > userspace originally added, the second check on the DRM connector
> > doesn't cause any issues. Remember: if we're trying to retrain an MST
> > topology at a lower link rate then before, that means changing the PBN
> > divisor which in turn means that the only valid actions that can be
> > taken are recalculating every active VCPI allocation at once in order to
> > prevent state inconsistencies, or disabling all of the displays (since
> > going from >0 VCPI to 0 VCPI should always be safe).
> >
> > We /could/ just leave this up to the driver to do the bookkeeping on
> > this, but that seems rather redundant. We could add extra bookkeeping in
> > the atomic check though so that instead of just deleting the structs for
> > each VCPI allocation when they go to 0, we instead just set them to 0
> > then free them somewhere else.
>
> jfyi; I think it would go something like this:
>
> drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots():
>
> for each vcpi:
> if vcpi.port == port:
> vcpi.vcpi = 0
> return 0;
>
> drm_error("No previous VCPI allocation found! Help!!!\n");
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Then we'd need to add something to prune the VCPI allocations in the state,
> which the driver would call after all atomic checks/mode validations have been
> performed, including drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()
>
> drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_finish():
> for each vcpi:
> if vcpi.vcpi == 0:
> del vcpi
>
> Then, that way we've made sure that multiple VCPI frees in the same check are
> OK, but freeing VCPI that never existed actually throws errors
Not sure that's needed at all. The way link training works is we just ask
userspace to do the heavy lifting for us, by issuing a new modeset. If
that means mode pruning, we also ask userspace to do the heavy lifting for
us, again by issuing a new modeset. Kernel never needs to retrain if that
means recomputing state stuff or pruning modes or other fun problems. It
doesn't even need to retrain if that means shutting down a bunch of links,
it can just punt that to userspace and let it retrain at a convenient
time.
Of course that retrain might then result in a modeset, which might fail if
the connector is entirely gone by then.
Otoh I might just be talking nonsense right now, it's a bit late :-)
Cheers, Daniel
> >
> > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots);
> > > > @@ -3112,15 +3164,34 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_connector_work(struct
> > > > work_struct *work)
> > > > static struct drm_private_state *
> > > > drm_dp_mst_duplicate_state(struct drm_private_obj *obj)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state;
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state, *old_state =
> > > > + to_dp_mst_topology_state(obj->state);
> > > > + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *pos, *vcpi;
> > > >
> > > > - state = kmemdup(obj->state, sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + state = kmemdup(old_state, sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > if (!state)
> > > > return NULL;
> > > >
> > > > __drm_atomic_helper_private_obj_duplicate_state(obj, &state->base);
> > > >
> > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&state->vcpis);
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(pos, &old_state->vcpis, next) {
> > > > + vcpi = kmemdup(pos, sizeof(*vcpi), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!vcpi)
> > > > + goto fail_alloc;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_add(&vcpi->next, &state->vcpis);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > return &state->base;
> > > > +
> > > > +fail_alloc:
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, vcpi, &state->vcpis, next)
> > > > + kfree(pos);
> > > > + kfree(state);
> > > > +
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void drm_dp_mst_destroy_state(struct drm_private_obj *obj,
> > > > @@ -3128,14 +3199,99 @@ static void drm_dp_mst_destroy_state(struct
> > > > drm_private_obj *obj,
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state =
> > > > to_dp_mst_topology_state(state);
> > > > + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *pos, *tmp;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &mst_state->vcpis, next)
> > > > + kfree(pos);
> > > >
> > > > kfree(mst_state);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct drm_private_state_funcs mst_state_funcs = {
> > > > +static inline int
> > > > +drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr
> > > > *mgr,
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state
> > > > *mst_state)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> > > > + int avail_slots = 63, ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &mst_state->vcpis, next) {
> > > > + /* Ports that no longer exist shouldn't be counted towards the
> > > > + * bandwidth requirements for the state, so skip them
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > Scenario:
> > > - 2 mst sinks on a single host side port.
> > > - 1st connector is active, 2nd connector is off.
> > > - 1st connector is hot-unplugged, but userspace hasn't realized this yet,
> > > so not yet come around to do the disabling modeset.
> > > - At the same time userspace decides to enable the 2nd output, which
> > > forces a modeset and pulls the topology state in.
> > > - This function here decides to only look at the vcpi allocation for the
> > > 2nd connector because the first one is gone already.
> > > - Unfortunately lighting up both connectors at the same time isn't
> > > possible, because too many vcpi. But since userspace didn't ask for a
> > > modeset on the now unplugged first connector.
> > > -> Modeset goes boom because we enable too many vcpi.
> > >
> > > But with the change in how we release vcpi allocations there's no need to
> > > ignore disconnected stuff here, and we should be able to check vcpi limits
> > > by just checking all of them.
> > >
> > > I didn't see anything else serious, so with the above two things resolved
> > > this has my Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > >
> > > One bikeshed below, because I need to prove I scrolled to the end :-)
> > >
> > > > + port = drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref(mgr, vcpi->port);
> > > > + if (!port) {
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST PORT:%p] is stale, skipping
> > > > checks\n",
> > > > + vcpi->port);
> > > > + continue;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST PORT:%p] requires %d vcpi slots\n",
> > > > + vcpi->port, vcpi->vcpi);
> > > > +
> > > > + avail_slots -= vcpi->vcpi;
> > > > + if (avail_slots < 0) {
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST PORT:%p] not enough vcpi slots
> > > > in mst_state %p (avail=%d)\n",
> > > > + vcpi->port, mst_state,
> > > > + avail_slots + vcpi->vcpi);
> > > > + ret = -ENOSPC;
> > > > + goto port_fail;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + drm_dp_put_port(port);
> > > > + }
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] mst_state %p vcpi avail=%d used=%d\n",
> > > > + mgr, mst_state, avail_slots,
> > > > + 63 - avail_slots);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +port_fail:
> > > > + drm_dp_put_port(port);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check - Check that the new state of an MST
> > > > topology
> > > > in an
> > > > + * atomic update is valid
> > > > + * @state: Pointer to the new &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Checks the given topology state for an atomic update to ensure that
> > > > it's
> > > > + * valid. This includes checking whether there's enough bandwidth to
> > > > support
> > > > + * the new VCPI allocations in the atomic update.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Any atomic drivers supporting DP MST must make sure to call this
> > > > after
> > > > + * checking the rest of their state in their
> > > > + * &drm_mode_config_funcs.atomic_check() callback.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * See also:
> > > > + * drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots()
> > > > + * drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots()
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Returns:
> > > > + *
> > > > + * 0 if the new state is valid, negative error code otherwise.
> > > > + */
> > > > +int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr;
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
> > > > + int i, ret = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + for_each_new_mst_mgr_in_state(state, mgr, mst_state, i) {
> > > > + ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(mgr, mst_state);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_check);
> > > > +
> > > > +const struct drm_private_state_funcs drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs =
> > > > {
> > > > .atomic_duplicate_state = drm_dp_mst_duplicate_state,
> > > > .atomic_destroy_state = drm_dp_mst_destroy_state,
> > > > };
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs);
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state: get MST topology state
> > > > @@ -3213,13 +3369,11 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(struct
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > mst_state->mgr = mgr;
> > > > -
> > > > - /* max. time slots - one slot for MTP header */
> > > > - mst_state->avail_slots = 63;
> > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mst_state->vcpis);
> > > >
> > > > drm_atomic_private_obj_init(&mgr->base,
> > > > &mst_state->base,
> > > > - &mst_state_funcs);
> > > > + &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs);
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > index bbf8ca21a7a2..8749cf61a6ac 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > @@ -12553,6 +12553,10 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device
> > > > *dev,
> > > > "[modeset]" : "[fastset]");
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(state);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > >
> > > Complete bikeshed, so feel free to ignore: I'd stuff this into
> > > intel_modeset_checks(). Feel free to ignore.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Daniel
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > if (any_ms) {
> > > > ret = intel_modeset_checks(state);
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > > index 8b71d64ebd9d..aaf904738b78 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > > @@ -114,28 +114,31 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct
> > > > drm_connector *connector,
> > > > struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state;
> > > > struct drm_crtc *old_crtc;
> > > > struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > > > - int slots, ret = 0;
> > > > + struct intel_connector *intel_connector =
> > > > + to_intel_connector(connector);
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr =
> > > > + &intel_connector->mst_port->mst_mgr;
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port = intel_connector->port;
> > > > + int ret = 0;
> > > >
> > > > old_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_old_connector_state(state, connector);
> > > > old_crtc = old_conn_state->crtc;
> > > > if (!old_crtc)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > - crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, old_crtc);
> > > > - slots = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state)->dp_m_n.tu;
> > > > - if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state) && slots > 0) {
> > > > - struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr;
> > > > - struct drm_encoder *old_encoder;
> > > > + /* Free VCPI, since compute_config() won't be run */
> > > > + if (!new_conn_state->crtc) {
> > > > + crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, old_crtc);
> > > >
> > > > - old_encoder = old_conn_state->best_encoder;
> > > > - mgr = &enc_to_mst(old_encoder)->primary->dp.mst_mgr;
> > > > -
> > > > - ret = drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(state, mgr, slots);
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed releasing %d vcpi slots:%d\n",
> > > > slots, ret);
> > > > - else
> > > > - to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state)->dp_m_n.tu = 0;
> > > > + ret = drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(state, mgr, port);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed releasing vcpi slots: %d\n",
> > > > + ret);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state)->dp_m_n.tu = 0;
> > > > }
> > > > +
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > > b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > > index 3faceb66f5cb..08b67948b8f9 100644
> > > > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > > @@ -406,9 +406,15 @@ struct drm_dp_payload {
> > > >
> > > > #define to_dp_mst_topology_state(x) container_of(x, struct
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_state, base)
> > > >
> > > > +struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation {
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
> > > > + int vcpi;
> > > > + struct list_head next;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state {
> > > > struct drm_private_state base;
> > > > - int avail_slots;
> > > > + struct list_head vcpis;
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > @@ -619,14 +625,17 @@ void drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_suspend(struct
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);
> > > > int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr
> > > > *mgr);
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state
> > > > *drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > struct
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);
> > > > -int drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > - struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > - struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, int pbn);
> > > > -int drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > - struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > - int slots);
> > > > +int __must_check
> > > > +drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, int pbn);
> > > > +int __must_check
> > > > +drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port);
> > > > int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > > struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, bool power_up);
> > > > +int __must_check drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_atomic_state
> > > > *state);
> > > >
> > > > extern const struct drm_private_state_funcs
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs;
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.19.1
> > > >
> --
> Cheers,
> Lyude Paul
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list