[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 30 22:40:19 UTC 2018
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:30:45PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> [...]
> > > Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-
> > > interpretation.rst?
> > > As has been pointed out, it contains a clear answer to how things
> > > should be interpreted here.
> >
> > Ugh, was not aware that there two documents.
> >
> > Yeah, definitely sheds light. Why the documents could not be merged
> > to single common sense code of conduct?
>
> The fact that we've arrived at essentially an original CoC
> reinterpreted to the point where it's effectively a new CoC has been
> the source of much debate and recrimination over the last few months
> ... you can read it in the ksummit-discuss archives, but I really think
> we don't want to reopen that can of worms.
Got you... Well I now read the 2nd amendment now through, and yeah, kind
of way I work/function anyway.
Thank you for the patience...
/Jarkko
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list