[PATCH v2 09/13] udmabuf: use EBADFD in case we didn't got a memfd

Gerd Hoffmann kraxel at redhat.com
Tue Sep 11 13:42:12 UTC 2018


Reported-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
index e821361566..652707f993 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
@@ -154,14 +154,17 @@ static long udmabuf_create(const struct udmabuf_create_list *head,
 
 	pgbuf = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < head->count; i++) {
+		ret = -EBADFD;
 		memfd = fget(list[i].memfd);
 		if (!memfd)
 			goto err;
 		if (!shmem_mapping(file_inode(memfd)->i_mapping))
 			goto err;
 		seals = memfd_fcntl(memfd, F_GET_SEALS, 0);
-		if (seals == -EINVAL ||
-		    (seals & SEALS_WANTED) != SEALS_WANTED ||
+		if (seals == -EINVAL)
+			goto err;
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		if ((seals & SEALS_WANTED) != SEALS_WANTED ||
 		    (seals & SEALS_DENIED) != 0)
 			goto err;
 		pgoff = list[i].offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-- 
2.9.3



More information about the dri-devel mailing list