[PATCH 4/7] drm/lease: Check for lessor outside of locks

[Dave Airlie]

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 18:07, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon at collabora.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:49:07 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> > The lessor is invariant over a lifetime of a lease, we don't have to
> > grab any locks for that. Speeds up the common case of not being a lease.
> >
> > Cc: Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
> > index cce5d9dd52ff..694ff363a90b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
> > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static bool _drm_has_leased(struct drm_master *master, int id)
> >   */
> >  bool _drm_lease_held(struct drm_file *file_priv, int id)
> >  {
> > -     if (file_priv == NULL || file_priv->master == NULL)
> > +     if (!file_priv || !file_priv->master)
>
> Looks like you're doing unrelated cosmetic changes in the same patch.
> Maybe mention that in the commit message, or move that to a separate
> patch.
>
> >               return true;
> >
> >       return _drm_lease_held_master(file_priv->master, id);
> > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ bool drm_lease_held(struct drm_file *file_priv, int id)
> >       struct drm_master *master;
> >       bool ret;
> >
> > -     if (file_priv == NULL || file_priv->master == NULL)
> > +     if (!file_priv || !file_priv->master || !file_priv->master->lessor)
> >               return true;
> >
> >       master = file_priv->master;
> > @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ uint32_t drm_lease_filter_crtcs(struct drm_file *file_priv, uint32_t crtcs_in)
> >       int count_in, count_out;
> >       uint32_t crtcs_out = 0;
> >
> > -     if (file_priv == NULL || file_priv->master == NULL)
> > +     if (!file_priv || !file_priv->master || !file_priv->master->lessor)
> >               return crtcs_in;
> >
> >       master = file_priv->master;
>
> Couldn't we also remove the if (master->lessor) check done in
> _drm_lease_held_master()?

Daniel, answers for these? ^^

Dave.