[PATCH libdrm] headers: Sync with drm-next
Rob Clark
robdclark at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 01:49:33 UTC 2019
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:27 AM Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 2019-04-09 12:59:13 +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2019-04-09 11:35:14 +0000, Ayan Halder wrote:
> > > Generated using make headers_install from the drm-next
> > > tree - git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm
> > > branch - drm-next
> > > commit - 14d2bd53a47a7e1cb3e03d00a6b952734cf90f3f
> > >
> > > The changes were as follows :-
> > >
> > > core: (drm.h, drm_fourcc.h, drm_mode.h)
> > > - Added 'struct drm_syncobj_transfer', 'struct drm_syncobj_timeline_wait' and 'struct drm_syncobj_timeline_array'
> > > - Added various DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_ ioctls
> > > - Added some new RGB and YUV formats
> > > - Added 'DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VENDOR_ALLWINNER'
> > > - Added 'SAMSUNG' and Arm's 'AFBC' and 'ALLWINNER' format modifiers
> > > - Added 'struct drm_mode_rect'
> > >
> > > i915:
> > > - Added struct 'struct i915_user_extension' and various 'struct drm_i915_gem_context_'
> > > - Added different modes of per-process Graphics Translation Table
> > >
> > > msm:
> > > - Added various get or set GEM buffer info flags
> > > - Added some MSM_SUBMIT_BO_ macros
> > > - Modified 'struct drm_msm_gem_info'
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar halder <ayan.halder at arm.com>
> >
> > This looks sane, and applies cleanly :)
> > Acked-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at intel.com>
>
> Actually, revoking that, as this patch breaks the build; see below.
>
> >
> > > ---
> > > include/drm/drm.h | 36 +++++++
> > > include/drm/drm_fourcc.h | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/drm/drm_mode.h | 23 ++++-
> > > include/drm/i915_drm.h | 237 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > include/drm/msm_drm.h | 25 +++--
> > > 5 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> > >
> [snip]
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/msm_drm.h b/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > index c06d0a5..91a16b3 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > @@ -105,14 +105,24 @@ struct drm_msm_gem_new {
> > > __u32 handle; /* out */
> > > };
> > >
> > > -#define MSM_INFO_IOVA 0x01
> > > -
> > > -#define MSM_INFO_FLAGS (MSM_INFO_IOVA)
> > > +/* Get or set GEM buffer info. The requested value can be passed
> > > + * directly in 'value', or for data larger than 64b 'value' is a
> > > + * pointer to userspace buffer, with 'len' specifying the number of
> > > + * bytes copied into that buffer. For info returned by pointer,
> > > + * calling the GEM_INFO ioctl with null 'value' will return the
> > > + * required buffer size in 'len'
> > > + */
> > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_OFFSET 0x00 /* get mmap() offset, returned by value */
> > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_IOVA 0x01 /* get iova, returned by value */
> > > +#define MSM_INFO_SET_NAME 0x02 /* set the debug name (by pointer) */
> > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_NAME 0x03 /* get debug name, returned by pointer */
> > >
> > > struct drm_msm_gem_info {
> > > __u32 handle; /* in */
> > > - __u32 flags; /* in - combination of MSM_INFO_* flags */
> > > - __u64 offset; /* out, mmap() offset or iova */
> > > + __u32 info; /* in - one of MSM_INFO_* */
> > > + __u64 value; /* in or out */
> > > + __u32 len; /* in or out */
> > > + __u32 pad;
>
> freedreno/msm/msm_bo.c needs to be updated to reflect those changes.
I think you can just rename flags->info and offset->value, the rest of
the struct should be zero-initialized.. if in doubt you can check
$mesa/src/freedreno/drm/msm_bo.c
side-note: the libdrm_freedreno code was folded into mesa in 19.0, so
at *some* point we can probably disable libdrm_freedreno build by
default. (I'd kinda still like to keep the code around for some misc
standalone tools I have, but that is the sort of thing where I can fix
libdrm if it gets broken). When to switch to disabled by default I
guess comes down to how long we want to support mesa 18.x with latest
libdrm?? Maybe after 19.1, since (selfishly motivated) that gives me
a long enough window back in case I find myself needing to bisect for
some regression..
BR,
-R
>
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define MSM_PREP_READ 0x01
> > > @@ -188,8 +198,11 @@ struct drm_msm_gem_submit_cmd {
> > > */
> > > #define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_READ 0x0001
> > > #define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_WRITE 0x0002
> > > +#define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_DUMP 0x0004
> > >
> > > -#define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_FLAGS (MSM_SUBMIT_BO_READ | MSM_SUBMIT_BO_WRITE)
> > > +#define MSM_SUBMIT_BO_FLAGS (MSM_SUBMIT_BO_READ | \
> > > + MSM_SUBMIT_BO_WRITE | \
> > > + MSM_SUBMIT_BO_DUMP)
> > >
> > > struct drm_msm_gem_submit_bo {
> > > __u32 flags; /* in, mask of MSM_SUBMIT_BO_x */
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list