[PATCH 3/4] drm/amdgpu: Avoid HW reset if guilty job already signaled.
Koenig, Christian
Christian.Koenig at amd.com
Mon Apr 15 06:46:22 UTC 2019
Am 12.04.19 um 17:53 schrieb Grodzovsky, Andrey:
> On 4/12/19 3:39 AM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 11.04.19 um 18:03 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
>>> Also reject TDRs if another one already running.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> Stop all schedulers across device and entire XGMI hive before
>>> force signaling HW fences.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 125
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> index aabd043..ce9c494 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>> @@ -3327,7 +3327,8 @@ bool amdgpu_device_should_recover_gpu(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> static int amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> struct amdgpu_job *job,
>>> - bool *need_full_reset_arg)
>>> + bool *need_full_reset_arg,
>>> + bool job_signaled)
>>> {
>>> int i, r = 0;
>>> bool need_full_reset = *need_full_reset_arg;
>>> @@ -3339,8 +3340,6 @@ static int amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> if (!ring || !ring->sched.thread)
>>> continue;
>>> - drm_sched_stop(&ring->sched, &job->base);
>>> -
>>> /* after all hw jobs are reset, hw fence is meaningless, so
>>> force_completion */
>>> amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(ring);
>>> }
>>> @@ -3358,7 +3357,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> - if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
>>> + /* Don't suspend on bare metal if we are not going to HW reset
>>> the ASIC */
>>> + if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && !job_signaled) {
>>> if (!need_full_reset)
>>> need_full_reset = amdgpu_device_ip_need_full_reset(adev);
>>> @@ -3495,7 +3495,7 @@ static int amdgpu_do_asic_reset(struct
>>> amdgpu_hive_info *hive,
>>> return r;
>>> }
>>> -static void amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> +static void amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_device
>>> *adev, bool job_signaled)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> @@ -3505,7 +3505,8 @@ static void
>>> amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> if (!ring || !ring->sched.thread)
>>> continue;
>>> - if (!adev->asic_reset_res)
>>> + /* No point to resubmit jobs if we didn't HW reset*/
>>> + if (!adev->asic_reset_res && !job_signaled)
>>> drm_sched_resubmit_jobs(&ring->sched);
>>> drm_sched_start(&ring->sched, !adev->asic_reset_res);
>>> @@ -3518,14 +3519,21 @@ static void
>>> amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> adev->asic_reset_res = 0;
>>> }
>>> -static void amdgpu_device_lock_adev(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> +static bool amdgpu_device_lock_adev(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool
>>> trylock)
>>> {
>>> - mutex_lock(&adev->lock_reset);
>>> + if (trylock) {
>>> + if (!mutex_trylock(&adev->lock_reset))
>>> + return false;
>>> + } else
>>> + mutex_lock(&adev->lock_reset);
>>> +
>>> atomic_inc(&adev->gpu_reset_counter);
>>> adev->in_gpu_reset = 1;
>>> /* Block kfd: SRIOV would do it separately */
>>> if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
>>> amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset(adev);
>>> +
>>> + return true;
>>> }
>>> static void amdgpu_device_unlock_adev(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> @@ -3553,38 +3561,43 @@ static void amdgpu_device_unlock_adev(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> struct amdgpu_job *job)
>>> {
>>> - int r;
>>> + int r, i;
>> BTW: Usual kernel coding style is to use reverse xmas tree. E.g.
>> variables like "int i, r" last in the declarations.
>>
>>> struct amdgpu_hive_info *hive = NULL;
>>> - bool need_full_reset = false;
>>> struct amdgpu_device *tmp_adev = NULL;
>>> struct list_head device_list, *device_list_handle = NULL;
>>> + bool xgmi_topology_present, need_full_reset, job_signaled;
>>> + need_full_reset = job_signaled = false;
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device_list);
>>> dev_info(adev->dev, "GPU reset begin!\n");
>>> + hive = amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(adev, 0);
>> The second parameter should actually be a bool, so please use false here.
>>
>>> + xgmi_topology_present = hive &&
>>> adev->gmc.xgmi.num_physical_nodes > 1;
>> Why are we actually checking num_physical_nodes here?
> That the usual way of knowing you have XGMI topology, but having
> hive!=NULL should be equivalent so I can remove it.
>
>
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> - * In case of XGMI hive disallow concurrent resets to be triggered
>>> - * by different nodes. No point also since the one node already
>>> executing
>>> - * reset will also reset all the other nodes in the hive.
>>> + * Here we trylock to avoid chain of resets executing from
>>> + * either trigger by jobs on different adevs in XGMI hive or
>>> jobs on
>>> + * different schedulers for same device while this tdr is running.
>> Can we please completely drop the name "tdr" and just write "timeout
>> handler"?
>>
>>> + * We always reset all schedulers for device and all devices for
>>> XGMI
>>> + * hive so that should take care of them too.
>>> */
>>> - hive = amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(adev, 0);
>>> - if (hive && adev->gmc.xgmi.num_physical_nodes > 1 &&
>>> - !mutex_trylock(&hive->reset_lock))
>>> +
>>> + if (xgmi_topology_present && !mutex_trylock(&hive->reset_lock)) {
>>> + DRM_INFO("Bailing on TDR for s_job:%llx, hive: %llx as
>>> another already in progress",
>>> + job->base.id, hive->hive_id);
>>> return 0;
>>> + }
>>> /* Start with adev pre asic reset first for soft reset check.*/
>>> - amdgpu_device_lock_adev(adev);
>>> - r = amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(adev,
>>> - job,
>>> - &need_full_reset);
>>> - if (r) {
>>> - /*TODO Should we stop ?*/
>>> - DRM_ERROR("GPU pre asic reset failed with err, %d for drm
>>> dev, %s ",
>>> - r, adev->ddev->unique);
>>> - adev->asic_reset_res = r;
>>> + if (!amdgpu_device_lock_adev(adev, !xgmi_topology_present)) {
>>> + DRM_INFO("Bailing on TDR for s_job:%llx, as another already
>>> in progress",
>>> + job->base.id);
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>> + need_full_reset = amdgpu_device_ip_need_full_reset(adev);
>>> +
>>> /* Build list of devices to reset */
>>> if (need_full_reset && adev->gmc.xgmi.num_physical_nodes > 1) {
>> We should probably unconditionally stop all nodes on all device first
>> and then try to figure out if we actually need a full reset.
>>
>>> if (!hive) {
>>> @@ -3603,16 +3616,52 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> device_list_handle = &device_list;
>>> }
>>> + /* block all schedulers and reset given job's ring */
>>> + list_for_each_entry(tmp_adev, device_list_handle, gmc.xgmi.head) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGSBuild list of devices to reset
>>> ; ++i) {
>>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = tmp_adev->rings[i];
>>> +
>>> + if (!ring || !ring->sched.thread)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + drm_sched_stop(&ring->sched, &job->base);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Must check guilty signal here since after this point all old
>>> + * HW fences are force signaled.
>>> + *
>>> + * job->base holds a reference to parent fence
>>> + */
>>> + if (job && job->base.s_fence->parent &&
>>> + dma_fence_is_signaled(job->base.s_fence->parent))
>>> + job_signaled = true;
>> It would probably be better if we have a "goto abort;" or something
>> similar here.
>>
>> This also avoids giving the job_signaled variable to all the sub
>> functions.
>>
>> Christian.
>
> I agree this would be good in case of amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset
> because we can totally skip this function if guilty job already
> signaled, but for amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset it crates complications
> because drm_sched_start is right in the middle there after
> drm_sched_resubmit_jobs but before forcing back set mode in display so I
> prefer to keep passing 'job_signaled' to amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset.
> Alternative is to get rid of this function and bring it's body into
> amdgpu_device_gpu_recover which is already pretty cluttered and
> confusing. What do you think ?
Yeah, that's what I meant with that this still looks rather unorganized.
How about splitting up amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset into more
functions? Would that work out as well?
I think what we should do is to keep amdgpu_device_gpu_recover() the top
level control logic, e.g. which step is called on which device in which
order.
We should not push that decision into the individual steps, because that
would make things even more confusing.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Andrey
>
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + /* Guilty job will be freed after this*/
>>> + r = amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(adev,
>>> + job,
>>> + &need_full_reset,
>>> + job_signaled);
>>> + if (r) {
>>> + /*TODO Should we stop ?*/
>>> + DRM_ERROR("GPU pre asic reset failed with err, %d for drm
>>> dev, %s ",
>>> + r, adev->ddev->unique);
>>> + adev->asic_reset_res = r;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> retry: /* Rest of adevs pre asic reset from XGMI hive. */
>>> list_for_each_entry(tmp_adev, device_list_handle, gmc.xgmi.head) {
>>> if (tmp_adev == adev)
>>> continue;
>>> - amdgpu_device_lock_adev(tmp_adev);
>>> + amdgpu_device_lock_adev(tmp_adev, false);
>>> r = amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(tmp_adev,
>>> NULL,
>>> - &need_full_reset);
>>> + &need_full_reset,
>>> + job_signaled);
>>> /*TODO Should we stop ?*/
>>> if (r) {
>>> DRM_ERROR("GPU pre asic reset failed with err, %d for
>>> drm dev, %s ",
>>> @@ -3623,19 +3672,21 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> /* Actual ASIC resets if needed.*/
>>> /* TODO Implement XGMI hive reset logic for SRIOV */
>>> - if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
>>> - r = amdgpu_device_reset_sriov(adev, job ? false : true);
>>> - if (r)
>>> - adev->asic_reset_res = r;
>>> - } else {
>>> - r = amdgpu_do_asic_reset(hive, device_list_handle,
>>> &need_full_reset);
>>> - if (r && r == -EAGAIN)
>>> - goto retry;
>>> + if (!job || !job_signaled) {
>>> + if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
>>> + r = amdgpu_device_reset_sriov(adev, job ? false : true);
>>> + if (r)
>>> + adev->asic_reset_res = r;
>>> + } else {
>>> + r = amdgpu_do_asic_reset(hive, device_list_handle,
>>> &need_full_reset);
>>> + if (r && r == -EAGAIN)
>>> + goto retry;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> /* Post ASIC reset for all devs .*/
>>> list_for_each_entry(tmp_adev, device_list_handle, gmc.xgmi.head) {
>>> - amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset(tmp_adev);
>>> + amdgpu_device_post_asic_reset(tmp_adev, job_signaled);
>>> if (r) {
>>> /* bad news, how to tell it to userspace ? */
>>> @@ -3648,7 +3699,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> amdgpu_device_unlock_adev(tmp_adev);
>>> }
>>> - if (hive && adev->gmc.xgmi.num_physical_nodes > 1)
>>> + if (xgmi_topology_present)
>>> mutex_unlock(&hive->reset_lock);
>>> if (r)
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list