[PATCH] dma-buf: explicitely note that dma-fence-chains use 64bit seqno
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Mon Apr 15 19:47:16 UTC 2019
On 15/04/2019 13:56, Christian König wrote:
> Instead of checking the upper values of the sequence number use an explicit
> field in the dma_fence_ops structure to note if a sequence should be 32bit
> or 64bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
That works for me :)
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
> drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> index c729f98a7bd3..93c42078cb57 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void dma_fence_chain_release(struct dma_fence *fence)
> }
>
> const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_chain_ops = {
> + .use_64bit_seqno = true,
> .get_driver_name = dma_fence_chain_get_driver_name,
> .get_timeline_name = dma_fence_chain_get_timeline_name,
> .enable_signaling = dma_fence_chain_enable_signaling,
> @@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ void dma_fence_chain_init(struct dma_fence_chain *chain,
> init_irq_work(&chain->work, dma_fence_chain_irq_work);
>
> /* Try to reuse the context of the previous chain node. */
> - if (prev_chain && __dma_fence_is_later(seqno, prev->seqno)) {
> + if (prev_chain && __dma_fence_is_later(seqno, prev->seqno, prev->ops)) {
> context = prev->context;
> chain->prev_seqno = prev->seqno;
> } else {
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
> index 32dcf7b4c935..119b2ffbc2c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static bool timeline_fence_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> struct sync_timeline *parent = dma_fence_parent(fence);
>
> - return !__dma_fence_is_later(fence->seqno, parent->value);
> + return !__dma_fence_is_later(fence->seqno, parent->value, fence->ops);
> }
>
> static bool timeline_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
> index 4f6305ca52c8..ed3fb6e5224c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
>
> i_b++;
> } else {
> - if (__dma_fence_is_later(pt_a->seqno, pt_b->seqno))
> + if (__dma_fence_is_later(pt_a->seqno, pt_b->seqno,
> + pt_a->ops))
> add_fence(fences, &i, pt_a);
> else
> add_fence(fences, &i, pt_b);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index 6b788467b2e3..974717d6ac0c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ struct dma_fence_cb {
> *
> */
> struct dma_fence_ops {
> + /**
> + * @use_64bit_seqno:
> + *
> + * True if this dma_fence implementation uses 64bit seqno, false
> + * otherwise.
> + */
> + bool use_64bit_seqno;
> +
> /**
> * @get_driver_name:
> *
> @@ -410,18 +418,19 @@ dma_fence_is_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
> * __dma_fence_is_later - return if f1 is chronologically later than f2
> * @f1: the first fence's seqno
> * @f2: the second fence's seqno from the same context
> + * @ops: dma_fence_ops associated with the seqno
> *
> * Returns true if f1 is chronologically later than f2. Both fences must be
> * from the same context, since a seqno is not common across contexts.
> */
> -static inline bool __dma_fence_is_later(u64 f1, u64 f2)
> +static inline bool __dma_fence_is_later(u64 f1, u64 f2,
> + const struct dma_fence_ops *ops)
> {
> /* This is for backward compatibility with drivers which can only handle
> - * 32bit sequence numbers. Use a 64bit compare when any of the higher
> - * bits are none zero, otherwise use a 32bit compare with wrap around
> - * handling.
> + * 32bit sequence numbers. Use a 64bit compare when the driver says to
> + * do so.
> */
> - if (upper_32_bits(f1) || upper_32_bits(f2))
> + if (ops->use_64bit_seqno)
> return f1 > f2;
>
> return (int)(lower_32_bits(f1) - lower_32_bits(f2)) > 0;
> @@ -441,7 +450,7 @@ static inline bool dma_fence_is_later(struct dma_fence *f1,
> if (WARN_ON(f1->context != f2->context))
> return false;
>
> - return __dma_fence_is_later(f1->seqno, f2->seqno);
> + return __dma_fence_is_later(f1->seqno, f2->seqno, f1->ops);
> }
>
> /**
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list