[PATCH 2/6] PCI/P2PDMA: start with a whitelist for root complexes

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Fri Apr 19 17:13:11 UTC 2019


On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:09 AM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A lot of root complexes can still do P2P even when PCI devices
> don't share a common upstream bridge.
>
> Start adding a whitelist and allow P2P if both participants are
> attached to known good root complex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> index c52298d76e64..212baaa7f93b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ static void seq_buf_print_bus_devfn(struct seq_buf *buf, struct pci_dev *pdev)
>         seq_buf_printf(buf, "%s;", pci_name(pdev));
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * If we can't find a common upstream bridge take a look at the root complex and
> + * compare it to a whitelist of known good hardware.
> + */
> +static bool root_complex_whitelist(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +       struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> +       struct pci_dev *root = pci_get_slot(host->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
> +       unsigned short vendor, device;
> +
> +       if (!root)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       vendor = root->vendor;
> +       device = root->device;
> +       pci_dev_put(root);
> +
> +       /* AMD ZEN host bridges can do peer to peer */
> +       if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD && device == 0x1450)

We should also add:
(vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD && device == 0x1576) // Carrizo
(vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD && device == 0x1536) // Kaveri/kabini/mullins

Alex

> +               return true;
> +
> +       /* TODO: Extend that to a proper whitelist */
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Find the distance through the nearest common upstream bridge between
>   * two PCI devices.
> @@ -317,13 +342,13 @@ static void seq_buf_print_bus_devfn(struct seq_buf *buf, struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   * In this case, a list of all infringing bridge addresses will be
>   * populated in acs_list (assuming it's non-null) for printk purposes.
>   */
> -static int upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *a,
> -                                   struct pci_dev *b,
> +static int upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *provider,
> +                                   struct pci_dev *client,
>                                     struct seq_buf *acs_list)
>  {
> +       struct pci_dev *a = provider, *b = client, *bb;
>         int dist_a = 0;
>         int dist_b = 0;
> -       struct pci_dev *bb = NULL;
>         int acs_cnt = 0;
>
>         /*
> @@ -354,6 +379,13 @@ static int upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *a,
>                 dist_a++;
>         }
>
> +       /* Allow the connection if both devices are on a whitelisted root
> +        * complex, but add an arbitary large value to the distance.
> +        */
> +       if (root_complex_whitelist(provider) &&
> +           root_complex_whitelist(client))
> +               return 0x1000 + dist_a + dist_b;
> +
>         return -1;
>
>  check_b_path_acs:
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


More information about the dri-devel mailing list