Re: 回复:[PATCH v3 1/1] drm/syncobj: add sideband payload

Jason Ekstrand jason at jlekstrand.net
Thu Aug 8 16:23:05 UTC 2019


I've got a couple questions that I think go along the lines of what
Christian wrote:

1. Should it really be called sideband?  It's a very generic term for what
is currently a very generic thing.  However, maybe we don't want it to be
so generic?

2. Do we really want get/set?  Or do we want get/increment?  We have to do
the get/increment during vkQueueSubmit on both the wait and the signal side
but get+add+set is a bit heavy.  I guess you could do one bit get of all
the binary semaphores and then a set for all the signaled ones which sets
them to the previous value + 1.

My concern with making it a super-generic thing is that it has an extremely
specific use and in order for cross-process sharing to work, all users have
to use it exactly the same way.  We could call it a "reserved value" or
something like that to make it more clear what the intention is.  In any
case, we should make sure that it's very clearly documented in the design
doc.

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
wrote:

> Yeah, the idea is indeed rather clever. I'm just wondering if we don't
> need to optimize it even more.
>
> In other words could some IOCTL overhead be saved here if we directly take
> the value for binary semaphores waits and signals?
>
> Christian.
>
> Am 08.08.19 um 17:23 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>
> Thank you, I got your mean.
> when you have sideband payload, you will go into timeline path. Clever!
>
> -David
>
> -------- 原始邮件 --------
> 主题:Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/syncobj: add sideband payload
> 发件人:Lionel Landwerlin
> 收件人:"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,dri-devel at freedesktop.org
> 抄送:"Koenig, Christian" ,Jason Ekstrand ,"Zhou, David(ChunMing)"
>
> On 08/08/2019 17:48, Chunming Zhou wrote:
> > 在 2019/8/8 22:34, Lionel Landwerlin 写道:
> >> On 08/08/2019 17:16, Chunming Zhou wrote:
> >>> 在 2019/8/8 22:01, Lionel Landwerlin 写道:
> >>>> On 08/08/2019 16:42, Chunming Zhou wrote:
> >>>>> No, I just see your comment "The next vkQueueSubmit()
> >>>>> waiting on a the syncobj will read the sideband payload and wait for
> a
> >>>>> fence chain element with a seqno superior or equal to the sideband
> >>>>> payload value to be added into the fence chain and use that fence to
> >>>>> trigger the submission on the kernel driver. ".
> >>>> That was meant to say wait on the chain fence to reach the sideband
> >>>> payload value.
> >>>>
> >>>> It a bit confusing but I can't see any other way to word it.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> In that, you mentioned wait for sideband.
> >>>>> So I want to know we how to use that, maybe I miss something in
> >>>>> previous
> >>>>> discussing thread.
> >>>> In QueueSubmit(), we start by reading the sideband payloads :
> >>>>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/llandwerlin/mesa/blob/review/anv-timeline_semaphore_prep/src/intel/vulkan/anv_queue.c#L655
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Then build everything for the submission and hand it over to the
> >>>> submission thread.
> >>>>
> >>>> Instead of the just waiting on the timeline semaphore values, we also
> >>>> wait on the binary semaphore sideband payload values.
> >>> Waiting on timeline values is when finding fence in kernel.
> >>
> >> Hmm aren't you waiting in a thread in userspace?
> > Yes, For timeline case, we can use waitForSyncobj()..., At begin of
> > QueueThread, I let it wait in cs_ioctl when drm_syncobj_find_fence.
> >
> > But I still didn't get how to wait on sideband for binary Syncobj.
> >
> > Ah, I see, you will compare it in your QueueThread, if sideband value is
> >   >= expected, then do submission, otherwise, loop QueueThread, right?
>
>
> Just treat binary semaphores as timelines and waitForSyncobj on the
> sideband payload value.
>
> It should make the submission thread any busier than currently.
>
>
> -Lionel
>
>
> >
> > That sounds the QueueThread will be always busy.
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> But I don't see how to wait/block in kernel when finding fence for
> >>> binary sideband payload  values.
> >>
> >> Essentially our driver now handles timelines & binary semaphore using
> >> dma-fence-chain in both cases.
> >
> >
> >> Only with timelines we take the values submitted by the vulkan
> >> application.
> >
> >> The binary semaphore auto increment on vkQueueSubmit() and that is
> >> managed by the userspace driver.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Lionel
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> -David
> >>>
> >>>> Finally before exiting the QueueSubmit() call, we bump the sideband
> >>>> payloads of all the binary semaphores have have been signaled :
> >>>>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/llandwerlin/mesa/blob/review/anv-timeline_semaphore_prep/src/intel/vulkan/anv_queue.c#L806
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Whoever calls QueueSubmit() after that will pickup the new sideband
> >>>> payload values to wait on.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Lionel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -DAvid
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 在 2019/8/8 21:38, Lionel Landwerlin 写道:
> >>>>>> Interesting question :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I didn't see any usecase for that.
> >>>>>> This sideband payload value is used for a wait so waiting on the
> wait
> >>>>>> value for another wait is bit meta :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you have a use case for that?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Lionel
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 08/08/2019 16:23, Chunming Zhou wrote:
> >>>>>>> The propursal is fine with me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> one question:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> how to wait sideband payload? Following patch will show that?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 在 2019/8/8 21:14, Lionel Landwerlin 写道:
> >>>>>>>> The Vulkan timeline semaphores allow signaling to happen on the
> >>>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>>> of the timeline without all of the its dependencies to be created.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The current 2 implementations (AMD/Intel) of the Vulkan spec on
> >>>>>>>> top of
> >>>>>>>> the Linux kernel are using a thread to wait on the dependencies
> >>>>>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>> given point to materialize and delay actual submission to the
> >>>>>>>> kernel
> >>>>>>>> driver until the wait completes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If a binary semaphore is submitted for signaling along the side
> >>>>>>>> of a
> >>>>>>>> timeline semaphore waiting for completion that means that the drm
> >>>>>>>> syncobj associated with that binary semaphore will not have a DMA
> >>>>>>>> fence associated with it by the time vkQueueSubmit() returns. This
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> the fact that a binary semaphore can be signaled and unsignaled as
> >>>>>>>> before its DMA fences materialize mean that we cannot just rely on
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> fence within the syncobj but we also need a sideband payload
> >>>>>>>> verifying
> >>>>>>>> that the fence in the syncobj matches the last submission from the
> >>>>>>>> Vulkan API point of view.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This change adds a sideband payload that is incremented with
> >>>>>>>> signaled
> >>>>>>>> syncobj when vkQueueSubmit() is called. The next vkQueueSubmit()
> >>>>>>>> waiting on a the syncobj will read the sideband payload and wait
> >>>>>>>> for a
> >>>>>>>> fence chain element with a seqno superior or equal to the sideband
> >>>>>>>> payload value to be added into the fence chain and use that
> >>>>>>>> fence to
> >>>>>>>> trigger the submission on the kernel driver.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> v2: Use a separate ioctl to get/set the sideband value (Christian)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> v3: Use 2 ioctls for get/set (Christian)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> >>>>>>>> Cc: Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
> <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
> >>>>>>>> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> <jason at jlekstrand.net>
> >>>>>>>> Cc: David(ChunMing) Zhou <David1.Zhou at amd.com>
> <David1.Zhou at amd.com>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>       drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h |  4 ++
> >>>>>>>>       drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c    |  5 +++
> >>>>>>>>       drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c  | 79
> >>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>>>>>       include/drm/drm_syncobj.h      |  9 ++++
> >>>>>>>>       include/uapi/drm/drm.h         |  2 +
> >>>>>>>>       5 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> >>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> >>>>>>>> index 51a2055c8f18..0c9736199df0 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -208,6 +208,10 @@ int drm_syncobj_timeline_signal_ioctl(struct
> >>>>>>>> drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >>>>>>>>                             struct drm_file *file_private);
> >>>>>>>>       int drm_syncobj_query_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> >>>>>>>> *data,
> >>>>>>>>                       struct drm_file *file_private);
> >>>>>>>> +int drm_syncobj_get_sideband_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> >>>>>>>> *data,
> >>>>>>>> +                   struct drm_file *file_private);
> >>>>>>>> +int drm_syncobj_set_sideband_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> >>>>>>>> *data,
> >>>>>>>> +                   struct drm_file *file_private);
> >>>>>>>>          /* drm_framebuffer.c */
> >>>>>>>>       void drm_framebuffer_print_info(struct drm_printer *p,
> >>>>>>>> unsigned
> >>>>>>>> int indent,
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> >>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> >>>>>>>> index f675a3bb2c88..48500bf62801 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -703,6 +703,11 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc
> >>>>>>>> drm_ioctls[]
> >>>>>>>> = {
> >>>>>>>>                     DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> >>>>>>>>           DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_QUERY,
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_query_ioctl,
> >>>>>>>>                     DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> >>>>>>>> +    DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_GET_SIDEBAND,
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_get_sideband_ioctl,
> >>>>>>>> +              DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> >>>>>>>> +    DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_SET_SIDEBAND,
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_set_sideband_ioctl,
> >>>>>>>> +              DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>           DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_CRTC_GET_SEQUENCE,
> >>>>>>>> drm_crtc_get_sequence_ioctl, 0),
> >>>>>>>>           DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_CRTC_QUEUE_SEQUENCE,
> >>>>>>>> drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl, 0),
> >>>>>>>>           DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATE_LEASE,
> >>>>>>>> drm_mode_create_lease_ioctl, DRM_MASTER),
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >>>>>>>> index b927e482e554..c90ef20b9242 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -1150,8 +1150,10 @@ drm_syncobj_reset_ioctl(struct drm_device
> >>>>>>>> *dev, void *data,
> >>>>>>>>           if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>>               return ret;
> >>>>>>>>       -    for (i = 0; i < args->count_handles; i++)
> >>>>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < args->count_handles; i++) {
> >>>>>>>>               drm_syncobj_replace_fence(syncobjs[i], NULL);
> >>>>>>>> +        syncobjs[i]->sideband_payload = 0;
> >>>>>>>> +    }
> >>>>>>>>              drm_syncobj_array_free(syncobjs,
> args->count_handles);
> >>>>>>>>       @@ -1321,6 +1323,81 @@ int drm_syncobj_query_ioctl(struct
> >>>>>>>> drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >>>>>>>>               if (ret)
> >>>>>>>>                   break;
> >>>>>>>>           }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    drm_syncobj_array_free(syncobjs, args->count_handles);
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    return ret;
> >>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +int drm_syncobj_get_sideband_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> >>>>>>>> *data,
> >>>>>>>> +                   struct drm_file *file_private)
> >>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>> +    struct drm_syncobj_timeline_array *args = data;
> >>>>>>>> +    struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs;
> >>>>>>>> +    uint64_t __user *points = u64_to_user_ptr(args->points);
> >>>>>>>> +    uint32_t i;
> >>>>>>>> +    int ret;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE))
> >>>>>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    if (args->pad != 0)
> >>>>>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    if (args->count_handles == 0)
> >>>>>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    ret = drm_syncobj_array_find(file_private,
> >>>>>>>> + u64_to_user_ptr(args->handles),
> >>>>>>>> +                     args->count_handles,
> >>>>>>>> +                     &syncobjs);
> >>>>>>>> +    if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>> +        return ret;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < args->count_handles; i++) {
> >>>>>>>> +        copy_to_user(&points[i], &syncobjs[i]->sideband_payload,
> >>>>>>>> sizeof(uint64_t));
> >>>>>>>> +        ret = ret ? -EFAULT : 0;
> >>>>>>>> +        if (ret)
> >>>>>>>> +            break;
> >>>>>>>> +    }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    drm_syncobj_array_free(syncobjs, args->count_handles);
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    return ret;
> >>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +int drm_syncobj_set_sideband_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void
> >>>>>>>> *data,
> >>>>>>>> +                   struct drm_file *file_private)
> >>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>> +    struct drm_syncobj_timeline_array *args = data;
> >>>>>>>> +    struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs;
> >>>>>>>> +    uint64_t __user *points = u64_to_user_ptr(args->points);
> >>>>>>>> +    uint32_t i;
> >>>>>>>> +    int ret;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE))
> >>>>>>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    if (args->pad != 0)
> >>>>>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    if (args->count_handles == 0)
> >>>>>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    ret = drm_syncobj_array_find(file_private,
> >>>>>>>> + u64_to_user_ptr(args->handles),
> >>>>>>>> +                     args->count_handles,
> >>>>>>>> +                     &syncobjs);
> >>>>>>>> +    if (ret < 0)
> >>>>>>>> +        return ret;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < args->count_handles; i++) {
> >>>>>>>> + copy_from_user(&syncobjs[i]->sideband_payload, &points[i],
> >>>>>>>> sizeof(uint64_t));
> >>>>>>>> +        ret = ret ? -EFAULT : 0;
> >>>>>>>> +        if (ret)
> >>>>>>>> +            break;
> >>>>>>>> +    }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>           drm_syncobj_array_free(syncobjs, args->count_handles);
> >>>>>>>>              return ret;
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h b/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> >>>>>>>> index 6cf7243a1dc5..b587b8e07547 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,15 @@ struct drm_syncobj {
> >>>>>>>>            * @file: A file backing for this syncobj.
> >>>>>>>>            */
> >>>>>>>>           struct file *file;
> >>>>>>>> +    /**
> >>>>>>>> +     * @sideband_payload: A 64bit side band payload.
> >>>>>>>> +     *
> >>>>>>>> +     * We use the sideband payload value to wait on binary
> syncobj
> >>>>>>>> fences
> >>>>>>>> +     * to materialize. It is a reservation mechanism for the
> >>>>>>>> signaler to
> >>>>>>>> +     * express that at some point in the future a dma fence with
> >>>>>>>> the same
> >>>>>>>> +     * seqno will be put into the syncobj.
> >>>>>>>> +     */
> >>>>>>>> +    u64 sideband_payload;
> >>>>>>>>       };
> >>>>>>>>          void drm_syncobj_free(struct kref *kref);
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> >>>>>>>> index 8a5b2f8f8eb9..cffdc6c9772c 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ extern "C" {
> >>>>>>>>       #define DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_QUERY DRM_IOWR(0xCB, struct
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_timeline_array)
> >>>>>>>>       #define DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_TRANSFER DRM_IOWR(0xCC, struct
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_transfer)
> >>>>>>>>       #define DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE_SIGNAL DRM_IOWR(0xCD,
> >>>>>>>> struct drm_syncobj_timeline_array)
> >>>>>>>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_GET_SIDEBAND DRM_IOR(0xCE, struct
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_timeline_array)
> >>>>>>>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_SET_SIDEBAND DRM_IOWR(0xCF, struct
> >>>>>>>> drm_syncobj_timeline_array)
> >>>>>>>>          /**
> >>>>>>>>        * Device specific ioctls should only be in their respective
> >>>>>>>> headers
> >>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20190808/2b93bb2f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list