[PATCH 2/5] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Thu Aug 15 16:25:16 UTC 2019
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:43:38PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > You have to wait for the gpu to finnish current processing in
> > invalidate_range_start. Otherwise there's no point to any of this
> > really. So the wait_event/dma_fence_wait are unavoidable really.
> I don't envy your task :|
> But, what you describe sure sounds like a 'registration cache' model,
> not the 'shadow pte' model of coherency.
> The key difference is that a regirstationcache is allowed to become
> incoherent with the VMA's because it holds page pins. It is a
> programming bug in userspace to change VA mappings via mmap/munmap/etc
> while the device is working on that VA, but it does not harm system
> integrity because of the page pin.
> The cache ensures that each initiated operation sees a DMA setup that
> matches the current VA map when the operation is initiated and allows
> expensive device DMA setups to be re-used.
> A 'shadow pte' model (ie hmm) *really* needs device support to
> directly block DMA access - ie trigger 'device page fault'. ie the
> invalidate_start should inform the device to enter a fault mode and
> that is it. If the device can't do that, then the driver probably
> shouldn't persue this level of coherency. The driver would quickly get
> into the messy locking problems like dma_fence_wait from a notifier.
> It is important to identify what model you are going for as defining a
> 'registration cache' coherence expectation allows the driver to skip
> blocking in invalidate_range_start. All it does is invalidate the
> cache so that future operations pick up the new VA mapping.
> Intel's HFI RDMA driver uses this model extensively, and I think it is
> well proven, within some limitations of course.
> At least, 'registration cache' is the only use model I know of where
> it is acceptable to skip invalidate_range_end.
I'm not really well versed in the details of our userptr, but both
amdgpu and i915 wait for the gpu to complete from
invalidate_range_start. Jerome has at least looked a lot at the amdgpu
one, so maybe he can explain what exactly it is we're doing ...
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel