[PATCH 1/3] dma_resv: prime lockdep annotations

Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Tue Aug 20 14:53:34 UTC 2019


Full audit of everyone:

- i915, radeon, amdgpu should be clean per their maintainers.

- vram helpers should be fine, they don't do command submission, so
  really no business holding struct_mutex while doing copy_*_user. But
  I haven't checked them all.

- panfrost seems to dma_resv_lock only in panfrost_job_push, which
  looks clean.

- v3d holds dma_resv locks in the tail of its v3d_submit_cl_ioctl(),
  copying from/to userspace happens all in v3d_lookup_bos which is
  outside of the critical section.

- vmwgfx has a bunch of ioctls that do their own copy_*_user:
  - vmw_execbuf_process: First this does some copies in
    vmw_execbuf_cmdbuf() and also in the vmw_execbuf_process() itself.
    Then comes the usual ttm reserve/validate sequence, then actual
    submission/fencing, then unreserving, and finally some more
    copy_to_user in vmw_execbuf_copy_fence_user. Glossing over tons of
    details, but looks all safe.
  - vmw_fence_event_ioctl: No ttm_reserve/dma_resv_lock anywhere to be
    seen, seems to only create a fence and copy it out.
  - a pile of smaller ioctl in vmwgfx_ioctl.c, no reservations to be
    found there.
  Summary: vmwgfx seems to be fine too.

- virtio: There's virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl, which does all the
  copying from userspace before even looking up objects through their
  handles, so safe. Plus the getparam/getcaps ioctl, also both safe.

- qxl only has qxl_execbuffer_ioctl, which calls into
  qxl_process_single_command. There's a lovely comment before the
  __copy_from_user_inatomic that the slowpath should be copied from
  i915, but I guess that never happened. Try not to be unlucky and get
  your CS data evicted between when it's written and the kernel tries
  to read it. The only other copy_from_user is for relocs, but those
  are done before qxl_release_reserve_list(), which seems to be the
  only thing reserving buffers (in the ttm/dma_resv sense) in that
  code. So looks safe.

- A debugfs file in nouveau_debugfs_pstate_set() and the usif ioctl in
  usif_ioctl() look safe. nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf() otoh breaks this
  everywhere and needs to be fixed up.

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
Cc: Christian K├Ânig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer at vmware.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
index 42a8f3f11681..3edca10d3faf 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 
 /**
  * DOC: Reservation Object Overview
@@ -107,6 +108,17 @@ void dma_resv_init(struct dma_resv *obj)
 			&reservation_seqcount_class);
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(obj->fence, NULL);
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(obj->fence_excl, NULL);
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {
+		if (current->mm)
+			down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+		ww_mutex_lock(&obj->lock, NULL);
+		fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+		fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+		ww_mutex_unlock(&obj->lock);
+		if (current->mm)
+			up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_init);
 
-- 
2.23.0.rc1



More information about the dri-devel mailing list