[PATCH 3/4] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Aug 20 20:24:40 UTC 2019
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:19:01AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> In some special cases we must not block, but there's not a
> spinlock, preempt-off, irqs-off or similar critical section already
> that arms the might_sleep() debug checks. Add a non_block_start/end()
> pair to annotate these.
>
> This will be used in the oom paths of mmu-notifiers, where blocking is
> not allowed to make sure there's forward progress. Quoting Michal:
>
> "The notifier is called from quite a restricted context - oom_reaper -
> which shouldn't depend on any locks or sleepable conditionals. The code
> should be swift as well but we mostly do care about it to make a forward
> progress. Checking for sleepable context is the best thing we could come
> up with that would describe these demands at least partially."
>
> Peter also asked whether we want to catch spinlocks on top, but Michal
> said those are less of a problem because spinlocks can't have an
> indirect dependency upon the page allocator and hence close the loop
> with the oom reaper.
>
> Suggested by Michal Hocko.
>
> v2:
> - Improve commit message (Michal)
> - Also check in schedule, not just might_sleep (Peter)
>
> v3: It works better when I actually squash in the fixup I had lying
> around :-/
>
> v4: Pick the suggestion from Andrew Morton to give non_block_start/end
> some good kerneldoc comments. I added that other blocking calls like
> wait_event pose similar issues, since that's the other example we
> discussed.
>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes at google.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse at redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> Cc: Wei Wang <wvw at google.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh at google.com>
> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang at intel.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> (v1)
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
Hi Peter,
Iirc you've been involved at least somewhat in discussing this. -mm folks
are a bit undecided whether these new non_block semantics are a good idea.
Michal Hocko still is in support, but Andrew Morton and Jason Gunthorpe
are less enthusiastic. Jason said he's ok with merging the hmm side of
this if scheduler folks ack. If not, then I'll respin with the
preempt_disable/enable instead like in v1.
So ack/nack for this from the scheduler side?
Thanks, Daniel
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> kernel/sched/core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 4fa360a13c1e..82f84cfe372f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -217,7 +217,9 @@ extern void __cant_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset);
> * might_sleep - annotation for functions that can sleep
> *
> * this macro will print a stack trace if it is executed in an atomic
> - * context (spinlock, irq-handler, ...).
> + * context (spinlock, irq-handler, ...). Additional sections where blocking is
> + * not allowed can be annotated with non_block_start() and non_block_end()
> + * pairs.
> *
> * This is a useful debugging help to be able to catch problems early and not
> * be bitten later when the calling function happens to sleep when it is not
> @@ -233,6 +235,25 @@ extern void __cant_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset);
> # define cant_sleep() \
> do { __cant_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); } while (0)
> # define sched_annotate_sleep() (current->task_state_change = 0)
> +/**
> + * non_block_start - annotate the start of section where sleeping is prohibited
> + *
> + * This is on behalf of the oom reaper, specifically when it is calling the mmu
> + * notifiers. The problem is that if the notifier were to block on, for example,
> + * mutex_lock() and if the process which holds that mutex were to perform a
> + * sleeping memory allocation, the oom reaper is now blocked on completion of
> + * that memory allocation. Other blocking calls like wait_event() pose similar
> + * issues.
> + */
> +# define non_block_start() \
> + do { current->non_block_count++; } while (0)
> +/**
> + * non_block_end - annotate the end of section where sleeping is prohibited
> + *
> + * Closes a section opened by non_block_start().
> + */
> +# define non_block_end() \
> + do { WARN_ON(current->non_block_count-- == 0); } while (0)
> #else
> static inline void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line,
> int preempt_offset) { }
> @@ -241,6 +262,8 @@ extern void __cant_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset);
> # define might_sleep() do { might_resched(); } while (0)
> # define cant_sleep() do { } while (0)
> # define sched_annotate_sleep() do { } while (0)
> +# define non_block_start() do { } while (0)
> +# define non_block_end() do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> #define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 9f51932bd543..c5630f3dca1f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -974,6 +974,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> struct mutex_waiter *blocked_on;
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
> + int non_block_count;
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> unsigned int irq_events;
> unsigned long hardirq_enable_ip;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 2b037f195473..57245770d6cc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3700,13 +3700,22 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
> /*
> * Various schedule()-time debugging checks and statistics:
> */
> -static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
> +static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev, bool preempt)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK
> if (task_stack_end_corrupted(prev))
> panic("corrupted stack end detected inside scheduler\n");
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
> + if (!preempt && prev->state && prev->non_block_count) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling in a non-blocking section: %s/%d/%i\n",
> + prev->comm, prev->pid, prev->non_block_count);
> + dump_stack();
> + add_taint(TAINT_WARN, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off())) {
> __schedule_bug(prev);
> preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
> @@ -3813,7 +3822,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
> rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> prev = rq->curr;
>
> - schedule_debug(prev);
> + schedule_debug(prev, preempt);
>
> if (sched_feat(HRTICK))
> hrtick_clear(rq);
> @@ -6570,7 +6579,7 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> rcu_sleep_check();
>
> if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
> - !is_idle_task(current)) ||
> + !is_idle_task(current) && !current->non_block_count) ||
> system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING || system_state > SYSTEM_RUNNING ||
> oops_in_progress)
> return;
> @@ -6586,8 +6595,8 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at %s:%d\n",
> file, line);
> printk(KERN_ERR
> - "in_atomic(): %d, irqs_disabled(): %d, pid: %d, name: %s\n",
> - in_atomic(), irqs_disabled(),
> + "in_atomic(): %d, irqs_disabled(): %d, non_block: %d, pid: %d, name: %s\n",
> + in_atomic(), irqs_disabled(), current->non_block_count,
> current->pid, current->comm);
>
> if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current))
> --
> 2.23.0.rc1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list