[PATCH v2 04/50] drm/bridge: Add connector-related bridge operations and data

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Boris,

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 06:41:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:16:35 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> 
> > +/**
> > + * enum drm_bridge_ops - Bitmask of operations supported by the bridge
> > + */
> > +enum drm_bridge_ops {
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT: The bridge can detect displays connected to
> > +	 * its output. Bridges that set this flag shall implement the
> > +	 * &drm_bridge_funcs->detect callback.
> > +	 */
> > +	DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT = BIT(0),
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID: The bridge can retrieve the EDID of the display
> > +	 * connected to its output. Bridges that set this flag shall implement
> > +	 * the &drm_bridge_funcs->get_edid callback.
> > +	 */
> > +	DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID = BIT(1),
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD: The bridge can detect hot-plug and hot-unplug
> > +	 * without requiring polling. Bridges that set this flag shall
> > +	 * implement the &drm_bridge_funcs->hpd_enable and
> > +	 * &drm_bridge_funcs->hpd_disable callbacks if they support enabling
> > +	 * and disabling hot-plug detection dynamically.
> > +	 */
> > +	DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD = BIT(2),
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @DRM_BRIDGE_OP_MODES: The bridge can retrieving the modes supported
> > +	 * by the display at its output. This does not include readind EDID
> > +	 * which is separately covered by @DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID. Bridges that set
> > +	 * this flag shall implement the &drm_bridge_funcs->get_modes callback.
> > +	 */
> > +	DRM_BRIDGE_OP_MODES = BIT(3),
> > +};
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * struct drm_bridge - central DRM bridge control structure
> >   */
> > @@ -398,6 +538,33 @@ struct drm_bridge {
> >  	const struct drm_bridge_funcs *funcs;
> >  	/** @driver_private: pointer to the bridge driver's internal context */
> >  	void *driver_private;
> > +	/** @ops: bitmask of operations supported by the bridge */
> > +	enum drm_bridge_ops ops;
> 
> Just realized that you're not checking ->ops and ->funcs consistency at
> attach() time (you're only checking ->ops in the tfp410 driver before
> calling ->funcs->detect() and ->funcs->get_modes() and they might be
> NULL).

Do you think that's an issue ? I would then expect the driver to crash
right away during development and the issue to be fixed.

> > +	/**
> > +	 * @type: Type of the connection at the bridge output
> > +	 * (DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_*). For bridges at the end of this chain this
> > +	 * identifies the type of connected display.
> > +	 */
> > +	int type;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @ddc: Associated I2C adapter for DDC access, if any.
> > +	 */
> > +	struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
> > +	/** private: */
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @hpd_mutex: Protects the @hpd_cb and @hpd_data fields.
> > +	 */
> > +	struct mutex hpd_mutex;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @hpd_cb: Hot plug detection callback, registered with
> > +	 * drm_bridge_hpd_enable().
> > +	 */
> > +	void (*hpd_cb)(void *data, enum drm_connector_status status);
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @hpd_data: Private data passed to the Hot plug detection callback
> > +	 * @hpd_cb.
> > +	 */
> > +	void *hpd_data;
> >  };

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart