[PATCH 05/26] drm/dp_mst: Add sideband down request tracing + selftests
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Aug 27 17:15:10 UTC 2019
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:49:17PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 16:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:42:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > Unfortunately the DP MST helpers do not have much in the way of
> > > debugging utilities. So, let's add some!
> > >
> > > This adds basic debugging output for down sideband requests that we send
> > > from the driver, so that we can actually discern what's happening when
> > > sideband requests timeout. Note that with this commit, we'll be dumping
> > > out sideband requests under both of the following conditions:
> > >
> > > - When the user has enabled DRM_UT_DP output, of course.
> > > - When the user has enabled DRM_UT_KMS or DRM_UT_DP, and a sideband
> > > request has failed in some way. This will allow for developers to get
> > > a basic idea of what's actually happening with failed modesets on MST,
> > > without needing to have DRM_UT_DP explicitly enabled.
> > >
> > > Since there wasn't really a good way of testing that any of this worked,
> > > I ended up writing simple selftests that lightly test sideband message
> > > encoding and decoding as well. Enjoy!
> > >
> > > Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan at amd.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 308 +++++++++++++++++-
> > > .../gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h | 24 ++
> > > .../gpu/drm/selftests/drm_modeset_selftests.h | 1 +
> > > .../drm/selftests/test-drm_dp_mst_helper.c | 212 ++++++++++++
> > > .../drm/selftests/test-drm_modeset_common.h | 1 +
> > > include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 2 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 543 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > index 9e382117896d..defc5e09fb9a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
> > > #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> > > #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h"
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * DOC: dp mst helper
> > > *
> > > @@ -68,6 +70,8 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_register_i2c_bus(struct drm_dp_aux
> > > *aux);
> > > static void drm_dp_mst_unregister_i2c_bus(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
> > > static void drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);
> > >
> > > +#define DBG_PREFIX "[dp_mst]"
> > > +
> > > #define DP_STR(x) [DP_ ## x] = #x
> > >
> > > static const char *drm_dp_mst_req_type_str(u8 req_type)
> > > @@ -124,6 +128,43 @@ static const char *drm_dp_mst_nak_reason_str(u8
> > > nak_reason)
> > > }
> > >
> > > #undef DP_STR
> > > +#define DP_STR(x) [DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_ ## x] = #x
> > > +
> > > +static const char *drm_dp_mst_sideband_tx_state_str(int state)
> > > +{
> > > + static const char * const sideband_reason_str[] = {
> > > + DP_STR(QUEUED),
> > > + DP_STR(START_SEND),
> > > + DP_STR(SENT),
> > > + DP_STR(RX),
> > > + DP_STR(TIMEOUT),
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(sideband_reason_str) ||
> > > + !sideband_reason_str[state])
> > > + return "unknown";
> > > +
> > > + return sideband_reason_str[state];
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +drm_dp_mst_rad_to_str(const u8 rad[8], u8 lct, char *out, size_t len)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > + u8 unpacked_rad[16];
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < lct; i++) {
> > > + if (i % 2)
> > > + unpacked_rad[i] = rad[i / 2] >> 4;
> > > + else
> > > + unpacked_rad[i] = rad[i / 2] & BIT_MASK(4);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* TODO: Eventually add something to printk so we can format the rad
> > > + * like this: 1.2.3
> > > + */
> >
> > lct *=2;
> >
> > missing here? And yeah the todo would be sweet, but quite a bit more
> > typing I guess.
> >
> > > + return snprintf(out, len, "%*phC", lct, unpacked_rad);
> > > +}
> > >
> > > /* sideband msg handling */
> > > static u8 drm_dp_msg_header_crc4(const uint8_t *data, size_t num_nibbles)
> > > @@ -256,8 +297,9 @@ static bool drm_dp_decode_sideband_msg_hdr(struct
> > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_hdr *hdr,
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(struct
> > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
> > > - struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *raw)
> > > +void
> > > +drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body
> > > *req,
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *raw)
> > > {
> > > int idx = 0;
> > > int i;
> > > @@ -362,6 +404,249 @@ static void drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(struct
> > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
> > > }
> > > raw->cur_len = idx;
> > > }
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_TESTS_ONLY(drm_dp_encode_sideband_req);
> > > +
> > > +/* Decode a sideband request we've encoded, mainly used for debugging */
> > > +int
> > > +drm_dp_decode_sideband_req(const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *raw,
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req)
> > > +{
> > > + const u8 *buf = raw->msg;
> > > + int i, idx = 0;
> > > +
> > > + req->req_type = buf[idx++] & 0x7f;
> > > + switch (req->req_type) {
> > > + case DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES:
> > > + case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY:
> > > + case DP_POWER_UP_PHY:
> >
> > OCD warning: the enum isn't ordered the same way here and in
> > drm_dp_encode_sideband_req().
> >
> > > + req->u.port_num.port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD:
> > > + {
> > > + struct drm_dp_allocate_payload *a =
> > > + &req->u.allocate_payload;
> > > +
> > > + a->number_sdp_streams = buf[idx] & 0xf;
> > > + a->port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > +
> > > + a->vcpi = buf[++idx] & 0x7f;
> >
> > Complain here if 0x80 is set?
> >
> > > +
> > > + a->pbn = buf[++idx] << 8;
> > > + a->pbn |= buf[++idx];
> > > +
> > > + idx++;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < a->number_sdp_streams; i++) {
> > > + a->sdp_stream_sink[i] =
> > > + (buf[idx + (i / 2)] >> ((i % 2) ? 0 :
> > > 4)) & 0xf;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_QUERY_PAYLOAD:
> > > + req->u.query_payload.port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > + req->u.query_payload.vcpi = buf[++idx] & 0x7f;
> >
> > Same here for the highest bit?
> >
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ:
> > > + {
> > > + struct drm_dp_remote_dpcd_read *r = &req->u.dpcd_read;
> > > +
> > > + r->port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > +
> > > + r->dpcd_address = (buf[idx] << 16) & 0xf0000;
> > > + r->dpcd_address |= (buf[++idx] << 8) & 0xff00;
> > > + r->dpcd_address |= buf[++idx] & 0xff;
> > > +
> > > + r->num_bytes = buf[++idx];
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_WRITE:
> > > + {
> > > + struct drm_dp_remote_dpcd_write *w =
> > > + &req->u.dpcd_write;
> > > +
> > > + w->port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > +
> > > + w->dpcd_address = (buf[idx] << 16) & 0xf0000;
> > > + w->dpcd_address |= (buf[++idx] << 8) & 0xff00;
> > > + w->dpcd_address |= buf[++idx] & 0xff;
> > > +
> > > + w->num_bytes = buf[++idx];
> > > +
> > > + w->bytes = kmemdup(&buf[++idx], w->num_bytes,
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > But if we go really strict on validation we'd need to make sure we don't
> > walk past raw->cur_len ... probably not worth it?
> >
> > > + if (!w->bytes)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ:
> > > + {
> > > + struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_read *r = &req->u.i2c_read;
> > > + struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_read_tx *tx;
> > > + bool failed = false;
> > > +
> > > + r->num_transactions = buf[idx] & 0x3;
> > > + r->port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < r->num_transactions; i++) {
> > > + tx = &r->transactions[i];
> > > +
> > > + tx->i2c_dev_id = buf[++idx] & 0x7f;
> > > + tx->num_bytes = buf[++idx];
> > > + tx->bytes = kmemdup(&buf[++idx],
> > > + tx->num_bytes,
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!tx->bytes) {
> > > + failed = true;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + idx += tx->num_bytes;
> > > + tx->no_stop_bit = (buf[idx] >> 5) & 0x1;
> > > + tx->i2c_transaction_delay = buf[idx] & 0xf;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (failed) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i < r->num_transactions; i++)
> > > + kfree(tx->bytes);
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r->read_i2c_device_id = buf[++idx] & 0x7f;
> > > + r->num_bytes_read = buf[++idx];
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_WRITE:
> > > + {
> > > + struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_write *w = &req->u.i2c_write;
> > > +
> > > + w->port_number = (buf[idx] >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > + w->write_i2c_device_id = buf[++idx] & 0x7f;
> > > + w->num_bytes = buf[++idx];
> > > + w->bytes = kmemdup(&buf[++idx], w->num_bytes,
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!w->bytes)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> >
> > For safety: Should we validate cur_len here? Or return it, and let the
> > caller deal with any mismatches.
> >
> > But I'm kinda leaning towards no safety here, since it's not dealing with
> > any replies we get from the hw/externally, which might be used for
> > attacking us. If we later on have the same thing but for
> > drm_dp_sideband_parse_reply() then a lot more fun.
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_TESTS_ONLY(drm_dp_decode_sideband_req);
> > > +
> > > +void
> > > +drm_dp_dump_sideband_msg_req_body(const struct
> > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
> > > + int indent, struct drm_printer *printer)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > +#define P(f, ...) drm_printf_indent(printer, indent, f, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > + if (req->req_type == DP_LINK_ADDRESS) {
> > > + /* No contents to print */
> > > + P("type=%s\n", drm_dp_mst_req_type_str(req->req_type));
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + P("type=%s contents:\n", drm_dp_mst_req_type_str(req->req_type));
> > > + indent++;
> > > +
> > > + switch (req->req_type) {
> > > + case DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES:
> > > + case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY:
> > > + case DP_POWER_UP_PHY:
> > > + P("port=%d\n", req->u.port_num.port_number);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD:
> > > + P("port=%d vcpi=%d pbn=%d sdp_streams=%d %*ph\n",
> > > + req->u.allocate_payload.port_number,
> > > + req->u.allocate_payload.vcpi, req->u.allocate_payload.pbn,
> > > + req->u.allocate_payload.number_sdp_streams,
> > > + req->u.allocate_payload.number_sdp_streams,
> > > + req->u.allocate_payload.sdp_stream_sink);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_QUERY_PAYLOAD:
> > > + P("port=%d vcpi=%d\n",
> > > + req->u.query_payload.port_number,
> > > + req->u.query_payload.vcpi);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ:
> > > + P("port=%d dpcd_addr=%05x len=%d\n",
> > > + req->u.dpcd_read.port_number, req->u.dpcd_read.dpcd_address,
> > > + req->u.dpcd_read.num_bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_WRITE:
> > > + P("port=%d addr=%05x len=%d: %*ph\n",
> > > + req->u.dpcd_write.port_number,
> > > + req->u.dpcd_write.dpcd_address,
> > > + req->u.dpcd_write.num_bytes, req->u.dpcd_write.num_bytes,
> > > + req->u.dpcd_write.bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ:
> > > + P("port=%d num_tx=%d id=%d size=%d:\n",
> > > + req->u.i2c_read.port_number,
> > > + req->u.i2c_read.num_transactions,
> > > + req->u.i2c_read.read_i2c_device_id,
> > > + req->u.i2c_read.num_bytes_read);
> > > +
> > > + indent++;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < req->u.i2c_read.num_transactions; i++) {
> > > + const struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_read_tx *rtx =
> > > + &req->u.i2c_read.transactions[i];
> > > +
> > > + P("%d: id=%03d size=%03d no_stop_bit=%d tx_delay=%03d:
> > > %*ph\n",
> > > + i, rtx->i2c_dev_id, rtx->num_bytes,
> > > + rtx->no_stop_bit, rtx->i2c_transaction_delay,
> > > + rtx->num_bytes, rtx->bytes);
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_WRITE:
> > > + P("port=%d id=%d size=%d: %*ph\n",
> > > + req->u.i2c_write.port_number,
> > > + req->u.i2c_write.write_i2c_device_id,
> > > + req->u.i2c_write.num_bytes, req->u.i2c_write.num_bytes,
> > > + req->u.i2c_write.bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + P("???\n");
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +#undef P
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_TESTS_ONLY(drm_dp_dump_sideband_msg_req_body);
> > > +
> > > +static inline void
> > > +drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(struct drm_printer *p,
> > > + const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req;
> > > + char buf[64];
> > > + int ret;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + drm_dp_mst_rad_to_str(txmsg->dst->rad, txmsg->dst->lct, buf,
> > > + sizeof(buf));
> > > + drm_printf(p, "txmsg cur_offset=%x cur_len=%x seqno=%x state=%s
> > > path_msg=%d dst=%s\n",
> > > + txmsg->cur_offset, txmsg->cur_len, txmsg->seqno,
> > > + drm_dp_mst_sideband_tx_state_str(txmsg->state),
> > > + txmsg->path_msg, buf);
> > > +
> > > + ret = drm_dp_decode_sideband_req(txmsg, &req);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + drm_printf(p, "<failed to decode sideband req: %d>\n", ret);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > + drm_dp_dump_sideband_msg_req_body(&req, 1, p);
> > > +
> > > + switch (req.req_type) {
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_WRITE:
> > > + kfree(req.u.dpcd_write.bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ:
> > > + for (i = 0; i < req.u.i2c_read.num_transactions; i++)
> > > + kfree(req.u.i2c_read.transactions[i].bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_WRITE:
> > > + kfree(req.u.i2c_write.bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > >
> > > static void drm_dp_crc_sideband_chunk_req(u8 *msg, u8 len)
> > > {
> > > @@ -893,6 +1178,11 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
> > > }
> > > }
> > > out:
> > > + if (unlikely(ret == -EIO && drm_debug & (DRM_UT_DP | DRM_UT_KMS))) {
> >
> > Hm I'd only check for DRM_UT_DP here.
> >
> > > + struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX);
> > > +
> > > + drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
> > > + }
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > @@ -1927,8 +2217,11 @@ static int process_single_tx_qlock(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > idx += tosend + 1;
> > >
> > > ret = drm_dp_send_sideband_msg(mgr, up, chunk, idx);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("sideband msg failed to send\n");
> > > + if (ret && unlikely(drm_debug & (DRM_UT_DP | DRM_UT_KMS))) {
> >
> > Same.
> >
> > > + struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX);
> > > +
> > > + drm_printf(&p, "sideband msg failed to send\n");
> > > + drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1990,6 +2283,13 @@ static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > > {
> > > mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > list_add_tail(&txmsg->next, &mgr->tx_msg_downq);
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(drm_debug & DRM_UT_DP)) {
> >
> > Like you do here.
> >
> > > + struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX);
> > > +
> > > + drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (list_is_singular(&mgr->tx_msg_downq))
> > > process_single_down_tx_qlock(mgr);
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..eeda9a61c657
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > + *
> > > + * Declarations for DP MST related functions which are only used in
> > > selftests
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright © 2018 Red Hat
> > > + * Authors:
> > > + * Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _DRM_DP_MST_HELPER_INTERNAL_H_
> > > +#define _DRM_DP_MST_HELPER_INTERNAL_H_
> > > +
> > > +#include <drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h>
> > > +
> > > +void
> > > +drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body
> > > *req,
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *raw);
> > > +int drm_dp_decode_sideband_req(const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *raw,
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req);
> > > +void
> > > +drm_dp_dump_sideband_msg_req_body(const struct
> > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
> > > + int indent, struct drm_printer *printer);
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* !_DRM_DP_MST_HELPER_INTERNAL_H_ */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_modeset_selftests.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_modeset_selftests.h
> > > index dec3ee3ec96f..1898de0b4a4d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_modeset_selftests.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_modeset_selftests.h
> > > @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ selftest(damage_iter_damage_one_outside,
> > > igt_damage_iter_damage_one_outside)
> > > selftest(damage_iter_damage_src_moved, igt_damage_iter_damage_src_moved)
> > > selftest(damage_iter_damage_not_visible,
> > > igt_damage_iter_damage_not_visible)
> > > selftest(dp_mst_calc_pbn_mode, igt_dp_mst_calc_pbn_mode)
> > > +selftest(dp_mst_sideband_msg_req_decode,
> > > igt_dp_mst_sideband_msg_req_decode)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_dp_mst_helper.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_dp_mst_helper.c
> > > index 51b2486ec917..ceca89babd65 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_dp_mst_helper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_dp_mst_helper.c
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > > #include <drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h>
> > > #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> > >
> > > +#include "../drm_dp_mst_topology_internal.h"
> > > #include "test-drm_modeset_common.h"
> > >
> > > int igt_dp_mst_calc_pbn_mode(void *ignored)
> > > @@ -34,3 +35,214 @@ int igt_dp_mst_calc_pbn_mode(void *ignored)
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +static bool
> > > +sideband_msg_req_equal(const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *in,
> > > + const struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *out)
> > > +{
> > > + const struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_read_tx *txin, *txout;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + if (in->req_type != out->req_type)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + switch (in->req_type) {
> > > + case DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES:
> > > + case DP_POWER_UP_PHY:
> > > + case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY:
> > > + case DP_ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD:
> > > + case DP_QUERY_PAYLOAD:
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ:
> > > + return memcmp(in, out, sizeof(*in)) == 0;
> >
> > Just memcmp the entire thing for everyrone (we assume kzalloc anyway), and
> > then only have the additional checks for the few cases we need it? Would
> > slightly reduce the code.
>
> Just realized also - this wouldn't work: remember that I2C_READ, DPCD_WRITE,
> and I2C_WRITE contain pointers which of course will be different even if the
> contents are the same. Unfortunately I don't think there's really a good
> solution for this, unless we want to just remove the pointers and store things
> within the down request struct itself
Uh ... disappoint :-/
Then at least put that into a comment, and maybe make this the default:
handler?
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ:
> > > +#define IN in->u.i2c_read
> > > +#define OUT out->u.i2c_read
> > > + if (IN.num_bytes_read != OUT.num_bytes_read ||
> > > + IN.num_transactions != OUT.num_transactions ||
> > > + IN.port_number != OUT.port_number ||
> > > + IN.read_i2c_device_id != OUT.read_i2c_device_id)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < IN.num_transactions; i++) {
> > > + txin = &IN.transactions[i];
> > > + txout = &OUT.transactions[i];
> > > +
> > > + if (txin->i2c_dev_id != txout->i2c_dev_id ||
> > > + txin->no_stop_bit != txout->no_stop_bit ||
> > > + txin->num_bytes != txout->num_bytes ||
> > > + txin->i2c_transaction_delay !=
> > > + txout->i2c_transaction_delay)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + if (memcmp(txin->bytes, txout->bytes,
> > > + txin->num_bytes) != 0)
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > +#undef IN
> > > +#undef OUT
> > > +
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_WRITE:
> > > +#define IN in->u.dpcd_write
> > > +#define OUT out->u.dpcd_write
> > > + if (IN.dpcd_address != OUT.dpcd_address ||
> > > + IN.num_bytes != OUT.num_bytes ||
> > > + IN.port_number != OUT.port_number)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + return memcmp(IN.bytes, OUT.bytes, IN.num_bytes) == 0;
> > > +#undef IN
> > > +#undef OUT
> > > +
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_WRITE:
> > > +#define IN in->u.i2c_write
> > > +#define OUT out->u.i2c_write
> > > + if (IN.port_number != OUT.port_number ||
> > > + IN.write_i2c_device_id != OUT.write_i2c_device_id ||
> > > + IN.num_bytes != OUT.num_bytes)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + return memcmp(IN.bytes, OUT.bytes, IN.num_bytes) == 0;
> > > +#undef IN
> > > +#undef OUT
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +__sideband_msg_req_encode_decode(int line,
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *in,
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *out)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_printer p = drm_err_printer(pr_fmt());
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx txmsg;
> > > + int i, ret;
> > > + bool eq;
> > > +
> > > + drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(in, &txmsg);
> > > + ret = drm_dp_decode_sideband_req(&txmsg, out);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + pr_err(pr_fmt("Failed to decode sideband request @ line %d:
> > > %d\n"),
> > > + line, ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + eq = sideband_msg_req_equal(in, out);
> > > + if (!eq) {
> > > + pr_err(pr_fmt("Encode/decode @ line %d failed, expected:\n"),
> > > + line);
> > > + drm_dp_dump_sideband_msg_req_body(in, 1, &p);
> > > + pr_err(pr_fmt("Got:\n"));
> > > + drm_dp_dump_sideband_msg_req_body(out, 1, &p);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + switch (in->req_type) {
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_DPCD_WRITE:
> > > + kfree(out->u.dpcd_write.bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ:
> > > + for (i = 0; i < out->u.i2c_read.num_transactions; i++)
> > > + kfree(out->u.i2c_read.transactions[i].bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DP_REMOTE_I2C_WRITE:
> > > + kfree(out->u.i2c_write.bytes);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Clear everything but the req_type for the input */
> > > + memset(&in->u, 0, sizeof(in->u));
> > > +
> > > + /* Clear the output entirely */
> > > + memset(out, 0, sizeof(*out));
> > > +
> > > + return eq ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int igt_dp_mst_sideband_msg_req_decode(void *unused)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body in = { 0 }, out = { 0 };
> > > + u8 data[] = { 0xff, 0x0, 0xdd };
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > +#define
> > > DO_TEST() \
> > > + do { \
> > > + if (__sideband_msg_req_encode_decode(__LINE__, &in, &out)) \
> > > + return -EINVAL; \
> > > + } while (0)
> >
> > I had a tiny wtf moment here until I realized this is a macro ... maybe
> > put the do on the first line and indent everything? Pure bikeshed to help
> > the blind ...
> >
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES;
> > > + in.u.port_num.port_number = 5;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_POWER_UP_PHY;
> > > + in.u.port_num.port_number = 5;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY;
> > > + in.u.port_num.port_number = 5;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD;
> > > + in.u.allocate_payload.number_sdp_streams = 3;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < in.u.allocate_payload.number_sdp_streams; i++)
> > > + in.u.allocate_payload.sdp_stream_sink[i] = i + 1;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.allocate_payload.port_number = 0xf;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.allocate_payload.vcpi = 0x7f;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.allocate_payload.pbn = U16_MAX;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_QUERY_PAYLOAD;
> > > + in.u.query_payload.port_number = 0xf;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.query_payload.vcpi = 0x7f;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ;
> > > + in.u.dpcd_read.port_number = 0xf;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.dpcd_read.dpcd_address = 0xfedcb;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.dpcd_read.num_bytes = U8_MAX;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_REMOTE_DPCD_WRITE;
> > > + in.u.dpcd_write.port_number = 0xf;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.dpcd_write.dpcd_address = 0xfedcb;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.dpcd_write.num_bytes = ARRAY_SIZE(data);
> > > + in.u.dpcd_write.bytes = data;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_REMOTE_I2C_READ;
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.port_number = 0xf;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.read_i2c_device_id = 0x7f;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.num_transactions = 3;
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.num_bytes_read = ARRAY_SIZE(data) * 3;
> > > + for (i = 0; i < in.u.i2c_read.num_transactions; i++) {
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.transactions[i].bytes = data;
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.transactions[i].num_bytes = ARRAY_SIZE(data);
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.transactions[i].i2c_dev_id = 0x7f & ~i;
> > > + in.u.i2c_read.transactions[i].i2c_transaction_delay = 0xf &
> > > ~i;
> > > + }
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > + in.req_type = DP_REMOTE_I2C_WRITE;
> > > + in.u.i2c_write.port_number = 0xf;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.i2c_write.write_i2c_device_id = 0x7f;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > + in.u.i2c_write.num_bytes = ARRAY_SIZE(data);
> > > + in.u.i2c_write.bytes = data;
> > > + DO_TEST();
> > > +
> > > +#undef DO_TEST
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > Extremely nice, more unit tests ftw!
> >
> > With the nits somehow figured out: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <
> > daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_modeset_common.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_modeset_common.h
> > > index 590bda35a683..0fcb8bbc6a1b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_modeset_common.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_modeset_common.h
> > > @@ -40,5 +40,6 @@ int igt_damage_iter_damage_one_outside(void *ignored);
> > > int igt_damage_iter_damage_src_moved(void *ignored);
> > > int igt_damage_iter_damage_not_visible(void *ignored);
> > > int igt_dp_mst_calc_pbn_mode(void *ignored);
> > > +int igt_dp_mst_sideband_msg_req_decode(void *ignored);
> > >
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > index c01f3ea72756..4c8d177e83e5 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> > > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ struct drm_dp_remote_dpcd_write {
> > > struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_read {
> > > u8 num_transactions;
> > > u8 port_number;
> > > - struct {
> > > + struct drm_dp_remote_i2c_read_tx {
> > > u8 i2c_dev_id;
> > > u8 num_bytes;
> > > u8 *bytes;
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> > >
> --
> Cheers,
> Lyude Paul
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list