[PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: display: Add bindings for LVDS bus-timings
Rob Herring
robh+dt at kernel.org
Thu Aug 29 14:03:10 UTC 2019
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:36 PM Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro at bp.renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Dual-LVDS connections need markers in the DT, this patch adds
> some common documentation to be referenced by both panels and
> bridges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro at bp.renesas.com>
>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> * new patch
> ---
> .../bindings/display/bus-timings/lvds.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bus-timings/lvds.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bus-timings/lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bus-timings/lvds.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f35b55a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bus-timings/lvds.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
(GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) is preferred for new bindings.
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bus-timings/lvds.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Common Properties for bus timings of LVDS interfaces
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
> + - Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro at bp.renesas.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + This document defines device tree properties common to LVDS and dual-LVDS
> + interfaces, where a dual-LVDS interface is a dual-link connection with even
> + pixels traveling on one connection, and with odd pixels traveling on the other
> + connection.
> + This document doesn't constitue a device tree binding specification by itself
typo: constitute
> + but is meant to be referenced by device tree bindings.
> + When referenced from panel or bridge device tree bindings, the properties
> + defined in this document are defined as follows. The panel and bridge device
> + tree bindings are responsible for defining whether each property is required
> + or optional.
> +
> +properties:
> + dual-lvds-even-pixels:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + This property is specific to an input port of a sink device. When
The schema should define what nodes these go in. The description seems
to indicate in 'port' nodes (or endpoint?), but your use in the panel
binding puts them in the parent.
> + specified, it marks the port as recipient of even-pixels.
> +
> + dual-lvds-odd-pixels:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + This property is specific to an input port of a sink device. When
> + specified, it marks the port as recipient of odd-pixels.
However, I don't think you even need these. A panel's port numbers are
fixed can imply even or odd. For example port at 0 can be even and port at 1
can be odd. The port numbering is typically panel specific, but we may
be able to define the numbering generically if we don't already have
panels with multiple ports.
Also, aren't there dual link DSI panels?
Rob
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list