[PATCH v2] drm/dp_mst: Correct the bug in drm_dp_update_payload_part1()

[Wayne Lin]

[Why]
If the payload_state is DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL in series, current
code doesn't delete the payload at current index and just move the
index to next one after shuffling payloads.

[How]
Drop the i++ increasing part in for loop head and decide whether
to increase the index or not according to payload_state of current
payload.

Changes since v1:
* Refine the code to have it easy reading
* Amend the commit message to meet the way code is modified now.

Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 81e92b260d7a..4ef6decc0551 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3176,9 +3176,11 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 			drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
-		if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL)
+	for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; /* do nothing */) {
+		if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL) {
+			i++;
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("removing payload %d\n", i);
 		for (j = i; j < mgr->max_payloads - 1; j++) {
-- 
2.17.1