[PATCH v3 19/21] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Toshiba LTA089AC29000 panel
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at collabora.com
Tue Dec 3 12:42:22 UTC 2019
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:17:24 +0200
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Add a new entry for the Toshiba LTA089AC29000 panel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at collabora.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > * None
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > index 5d487686d25c..27c92b44bd95 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > @@ -2937,6 +2937,39 @@ static const struct panel_desc toshiba_lt089ac29000 = {
> > .connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct drm_display_mode toshiba_lta089ac29000_mode = {
> > + .clock = 79500,
> > + .hdisplay = 1280,
> > + .hsync_start = 1280 + 192,
> > + .hsync_end = 1280 + 192 + 128,
> > + .htotal = 1280 + 192 + 128 + 64,
> > + .vdisplay = 768,
> > + .vsync_start = 768 + 20,
> > + .vsync_end = 768 + 20 + 7,
> > + .vtotal = 768 + 20 + 7 + 3,
> > + .vrefresh = 60,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct panel_desc toshiba_lta089ac29000 = {
> > + .modes = &toshiba_lta089ac29000_mode,
> > + .num_modes = 1,
> > + .size = {
> > + .width = 194,
> > + .height = 116,
> > + },
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME:
> > + * The panel supports 2 bus formats: jeida-24 and jeida-18. The
> > + * mode is selected through the 8b6b_SEL pin. If anyone ever needs
> > + * support for jeida-18 we should probably parse the 'data-mapping'
> > + * property.
> > + * In the unlikely event where 8b6b_SEL is connected to a GPIO, we'd
> > + * need a new infra to allow bus format negotiation at the panel level.
> > + */
> > + .bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_JEIDA,
> > + .bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_HIGH | DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_POSEDGE,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct drm_display_mode tpk_f07a_0102_mode = {
> > .clock = 33260,
> > .hdisplay = 800,
> > @@ -3392,6 +3425,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id platform_of_match[] = {
> > }, {
> > .compatible = "toshiba,lt089ac29000",
> > .data = &toshiba_lt089ac29000,
> > + }, {
> > + .compatible = "toshiba,lta089ac29000",
>
> Is this really different than "toshiba,lt089ac29000" ? Both have the
> exact same timing, the only difference is .bus_format, and according to
> https://www.avnet-integrated.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Files/Displays/Colour_TFT/LT089AC29000.pdf
> the "toshiba,lt089ac29000" is an LVDS panel.
I think you can select the LVDS format on the LTA variant which you
can't do on the LT089AC29000. But I agree, LT089AC29000 is definitely
not an DPI/RGB panel. At the same time, changing the definition is
likely to break existing users :-(.
>
> > + .data = &toshiba_lta089ac29000,
> > }, {
> > .compatible = "tpk,f07a-0102",
> > .data = &tpk_f07a_0102,
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list