[PATCH/RFC] drm: Remove unused Renesas SH Mobile DRM driver
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Tue Jan 22 03:07:10 UTC 2019
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:35 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:22:58PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> Since its incarnation in v3.7 almost 7 years ago, no users of the SH
> >>> Mobile DRM driver have appeared.
> >>>
> >>> Hence remove the driver. It can be resurrected from git history,
> >>> if/when needed.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> >>
> >> I'd prefer removing the fbdev variant tbh ...
> >
> > I understand ;-)
> >
> > But sh_mobile_lcdc_fb is used on 5 legacy SuperH platforms, and 1 ARM
> > platform. At least the latter is working fine.
> >
> >> Not sure why exactly the switch never happened.
> >
> > Me neither. I^HGoogle can't even find posted patches of board integration.
> >
> > Note that both drivers lack DT support, which would be very desirable on
> > ARM, as graphics is the single remaining working driver on the Atmark
> > Techno Armadillo 800 EVA board not using DT.
>
> Ah I wondered why the drm driver isn't just automatically picked up in
> today's neat world of DT (if you enable it in .config instead of the fbdev
> one). It's not even using DT yet :-/
I'd prefer dropping the fbdev driver too, but that would require porting
the SH boards to the DRM driver, and implement DT support for the ARM
board. I don't think anyone is willing to invest time in this, so I'm
fine dropping this driver as the boards are pretty much dead. I would,
however, also drop the fbdev driver in that case.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list