[PATCH 0/5] tda998x updates

[Brian Starkey]

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:56:09AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> (Removed what I assume is a typo on the Cc line - nd at arm.com)

Sadly not. I have to Cc (not Bcc!) nd at arm.com to remove the
confidentiality disclaimer which would otherwise be added.

Ugly, but my only option.

> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:45:10AM +0000, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:40:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This series adds support for programming the SPD and vendor infoframes.
> > > 
> > > It also adds support for pixel repeated modes - we were not rejecting
> > > these modes, but we also didn't have the implementation to support
> > > them.  As their implementation is simple, add it rather than rejecting
> > > the modes.
> > > 
> > > Support is also added for the bridge timing information, that upstream
> > > components may wish to use to adjust their output appropriately.
> > > 
> > > Lastly, rather than merely passing through the full-range RGB from the
> > > CRTC, adapt the RGB range to the capabilities of the display and the
> > > default range for the mode.  This means that if the display does not
> > > support the Q bit in the video infoframe, and the mode is defined to
> > > have limited range RGB, we will compress the output RGB range to
> > > limited range.
> > > 
> > > Tested on 4.20 with a Panasonic TV.
> > > 
> > >       drm/i2c: tda998x: add support for pixel repeated modes
> > >       drm/i2c: tda998x: add bridge timing information
> > >       drm/i2c: tda998x: add support for writing SPD
> > >       drm/i2c: tda998x: add vendor specific infoframe support
> > >       drm/i2c: tda998x: improve correctness of quantisation range
> > 
> > Only this cover letter made it to my inbox (and the dri-devel
> > archives, for what they're worth).
> 
> I think leave it a while longer - the series emails were accepted by
> gabe.freedesktop.org at 09:51 UTC, maybe it's still thinking about
> them.  If not, I don't think there's anything I can do about it.
> 
> > Is there somewhere I can take a look at the patches?
> 
> http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/log/?h=drm-tda998x-devel
> 
> contains very similar patches, but based on 4.20.  The series I posted
> were those patches rebased on the linux-drm drm-next branch - and there
> were some minor conflicts.

Great, thanks.

-Brian

> 
> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up