[PATCH 1/4] drm/vram: Set GEM object functions for PRIME

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> > But the new and the old ones are identical, right?  So why add/remove?
> > Why not just rename them?
> 
> Hmm, OK. Does that somehow make a difference (e.g., easier backporting
> or maintenance)?

Easier patch review (it is obvious then you only change the way the
functions are hooked up, not the actual code).  A bit less code churn.

cheers,
  Gerd