[PATCH v5 07/18] kunit: test: add initial tests

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:52:50AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:53 AM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:22 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:26:02AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/kunit/example-test.c b/kunit/example-test.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..f44b8ece488bb
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/kunit/example-test.c
> > >
> > > <-- snip -->
> > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This defines a suite or grouping of tests.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Test cases are defined as belonging to the suite by adding them to
> > > > + * `kunit_cases`.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Often it is desirable to run some function which will set up things which
> > > > + * will be used by every test; this is accomplished with an `init` function
> > > > + * which runs before each test case is invoked. Similarly, an `exit` function
> > > > + * may be specified which runs after every test case and can be used to for
> > > > + * cleanup. For clarity, running tests in a test module would behave as follows:
> > > > + *
> > >
> > > To be clear this is not the kernel module init, but rather the kunit
> > > module init. I think using kmodule would make this clearer to a reader.
> >
> > Seems reasonable. Will fix in next revision.
> >
> > > > + * module.init(test);
> > > > + * module.test_case[0](test);
> > > > + * module.exit(test);
> > > > + * module.init(test);
> > > > + * module.test_case[1](test);
> > > > + * module.exit(test);
> > > > + * ...;
> > > > + */
> 
> Do you think it might be clearer yet to rename `struct kunit_module
> *module;` to `struct kunit_suite *suite;`?

Yes. Definitely. Or struct kunit_test. Up to you.

  Luis