[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 059/171] drm/bridge: tfp410: fix use of cancel_delayed_work_sync

[Sasha Levin]

From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ti.com>

[ Upstream commit b1622cb3be4557fd086831ca7426eafe5f1acc2e ]

We use delayed_work in HPD handling, and cancel any scheduled work in
tfp410_fini using cancel_delayed_work_sync(). However, we have only
initialized the delayed work if we actually have a HPD interrupt
configured in the DT, but in the tfp410_fini, we always cancel the work,
possibly causing a WARN().

Fix this by doing the cancel only if we actually had the delayed work
set up.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190610135739.6077-2-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
index a879aac21246..3a8af9978ebd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
@@ -372,7 +372,8 @@ static int tfp410_fini(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct tfp410 *dvi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
-	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dvi->hpd_work);
+	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0)
+		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dvi->hpd_work);
 
 	drm_bridge_remove(&dvi->bridge);
 
-- 
2.20.1