[Bug 110967] Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110967

Jeremy Newton <Jeremy.Newton at amd.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Newton <Jeremy.Newton at amd.com> ---
The pro suffix denotes that it's a part of the PRO stack, not propriety (yes
misleading name, I know).

"PRO" does not mean it's closed source, though most of the PRO stack is closed.

ROCT for example is MIT as it's borrowed from ROCm.

As for the rest:
-AMF is closed source AFAIK
-opencl is closed source; this will be migrated to ROCm (MIT), but this is low
priority since ROCm is already completely packaged elsewhere.

We might strip the -pro from roct when we switch to ROCm, but I don't believe
there's a plan set in stone right now.

Closing as invalid for now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20190729/81ea7144/attachment-0001.html>