[PATCH] drm/syncobj: remove boring message

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 30/07/2019 12:27, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:20:39PM +0800, Chunming Zhou wrote:
>> It is normal that binary syncobj replaces the underlying fence.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou at amd.com>
> Do we hit this with one of the syncobj igts?
> -Daniel


With one of the tests sitting on the mailing list waiting for review, yes.


-Lionel


>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 3 ---
>>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> index 929f7c64f9a2..bc7ec1679e4d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> @@ -151,9 +151,6 @@ void drm_syncobj_add_point(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
>>   	spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
>>   
>>   	prev = drm_syncobj_fence_get(syncobj);
>> -	/* You are adding an unorder point to timeline, which could cause payload returned from query_ioctl is 0! */
>> -	if (prev && prev->seqno >= point)
>> -		DRM_ERROR("You are adding an unorder point to timeline!\n");
>>   	dma_fence_chain_init(chain, prev, fence, point);
>>   	rcu_assign_pointer(syncobj->fence, &chain->base);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel