[PATCH 5/8] drm/mgag200: Pin framebuffer BO during dirty update
Thomas Zimmermann
tzimmermann at suse.de
Tue Jun 4 15:41:58 UTC 2019
Another explicit lock operation of a GEM VRAM BO is located in mgag200's
framebuffer update code. Instead of locking the BO, we pin it to wherever
it is.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c
index 97c575a9a86f..dbcf179a120c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static void mga_dirty_update(struct mga_fbdev *mfbdev,
struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo;
int src_offset, dst_offset;
int bpp = mfbdev->mfb.base.format->cpp[0];
- int ret = -EBUSY;
+ int ret;
u8 *dst;
bool unmap = false;
bool store_for_later = false;
@@ -36,18 +36,20 @@ static void mga_dirty_update(struct mga_fbdev *mfbdev,
obj = mfbdev->mfb.obj;
gbo = drm_gem_vram_of_gem(obj);
- /* Try to lock the BO. If we fail with -EBUSY then
- * the BO is being moved and we should store up the
- * damage until later.
+ /* We pin the BO to system memory so it won't be moved during
+ * the update and doesn't waste video ram. If the BO is already
+ * located in VRAM, the pin operation will simply increment the
+ * pin count.
*/
- if (drm_can_sleep())
- ret = drm_gem_vram_lock(gbo, true);
- if (ret) {
- if (ret != -EBUSY)
- return;
-
+ if (drm_can_sleep()) {
+ ret = drm_gem_vram_pin(gbo, TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret != -EBUSY)
+ return;
+ store_for_later = true;
+ }
+ } else
store_for_later = true;
- }
x2 = x + width - 1;
y2 = y + height - 1;
@@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ static void mga_dirty_update(struct mga_fbdev *mfbdev,
drm_gem_vram_kunmap(gbo);
out:
- drm_gem_vram_unlock(gbo);
+ drm_gem_vram_unpin(gbo);
}
static void mga_fillrect(struct fb_info *info,
--
2.21.0
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list