[PATCH] drm: Ignore drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs in generated documentation

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and
> >> there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
> > 
> >> -/**
> >> +/*
> >>   * drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
> > 
> > "struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
> > 
> > (see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is
> > documented that way).
> 
> The documented source line is
> 
>   const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
> 
> and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.

Ah.  Missed that detail.

> Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I
> could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style
> with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way
> seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's
> not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.

Ok, patch is fine then.

Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>

(can you commit & push yourself meanwhile?)

cheers,
  Gerd