[PATCH libdrm 06/10] modetest: don't pretend that atomic mode includes a format

Ilia Mirkin imirkin at alum.mit.edu
Thu Jun 6 15:58:18 UTC 2019


On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 01:40, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
> > ---
> >  tests/modetest/modetest.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
> > index 9c85c07b..a1c81f6c 100644
> > --- a/tests/modetest/modetest.c
> > +++ b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
> > @@ -1335,8 +1335,8 @@ static void atomic_set_mode(struct device *dev, struct pipe_arg *pipes, unsigned
> >                 if (pipe->mode == NULL)
> >                         continue;
> >
> > -               printf("setting mode %s-%dHz@%s on connectors ",
> > -                      pipe->mode_str, pipe->mode->vrefresh, pipe->format_str);
> > +               printf("setting mode %s-%dHz on connectors ",
> > +                      pipe->mode_str, pipe->mode->vrefresh);
>
> AFAICT we can drop the format on modeset all together. I cannot see
> anything that would require it - regardless if the modeset is atomic
> or not.
> Plus we can remove the --help string and argument parsing code.
>
> Can I interest you in doing that?

The format plays with a non-atomic modeset. It's used for the fb that
gets added.

  -ilia


More information about the dri-devel mailing list