[PATCH v4 18/28] docs: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst

[Srivatsa S. Bhat]

On 6/12/19 10:52 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Convert the PM documents to ReST, in order to allow them to
> build with Sphinx.
> 
> The conversion is actually:
>   - add blank lines and identation in order to identify paragraphs;
>   - fix tables markups;
>   - add some lists markups;
>   - mark literal blocks;
>   - adjust title markups.
> 
> At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to
> the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> ---

[...]

> diff --git a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-cpuhotplug.txt b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-cpuhotplug.rst
> similarity index 90%
> rename from Documentation/power/suspend-and-cpuhotplug.txt
> rename to Documentation/power/suspend-and-cpuhotplug.rst
> index a8751b8df10e..9df664f5423a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-cpuhotplug.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-cpuhotplug.rst
> @@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
> +====================================================================
>  Interaction of Suspend code (S3) with the CPU hotplug infrastructure
> +====================================================================
>  
> -     (C) 2011 - 2014 Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> +(C) 2011 - 2014 Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>  
>  
> -I. How does the regular CPU hotplug code differ from how the Suspend-to-RAM
> -   infrastructure uses it internally? And where do they share common code?
> +I. Differences between CPU hotplug and Suspend-to-RAM
> +======================================================
> +
> +How does the regular CPU hotplug code differ from how the Suspend-to-RAM
> +infrastructure uses it internally? And where do they share common code?
>  
>  Well, a picture is worth a thousand words... So ASCII art follows :-)
>  

[...]

> @@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ execution during resume):
>  
>  It is to be noted here that the system_transition_mutex lock is acquired at the very
>  beginning, when we are just starting out to suspend, and then released only
> -after the entire cycle is complete (i.e., suspend + resume).
> +after the entire cycle is complete (i.e., suspend + resume)::
>  

I think that should be a period, not a colon, because it is clarifying
the text above it (as opposed to referring to the example below it).

Other than that, for suspend-and-cpuhotplug.txt:

Acked-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa at csail.mit.edu>
 
Regards,
Srivatsa
VMware Photon OS