[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/sun4i: tcon_top: Register clock gates in probe
Jagan Teki
jagan at amarulasolutions.com
Thu Jun 20 16:24:12 UTC 2019
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:24 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:34 PM Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:23 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:45 PM Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:49 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:30 PM Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:01 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:44 AM Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TCON TOP have clock gates for TV0, TV1, dsi and right
> > > > > > > > now these are register during bind call.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Of which, dsi clock gate would required during DPHY probe
> > > > > > > > but same can miss to get since tcon top is not bound at
> > > > > > > > that time.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To solve, this circular dependency move the clock gate
> > > > > > > > registration from bind to probe so-that DPHY can get the
> > > > > > > > dsi gate clock on time.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_tcon_top.c | 94 ++++++++++++++------------
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_tcon_top.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_tcon_top.c
> > > > > > > > index 465e9b0cdfee..a8978b3fe851 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_tcon_top.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_tcon_top.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -124,7 +124,53 @@ static struct clk_hw *sun8i_tcon_top_register_gate(struct device *dev,
> > > > > > > > static int sun8i_tcon_top_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> > > > > > > > void *data)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > + struct sun8i_tcon_top *tcon_top = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + ret = reset_control_deassert(tcon_top->rst);
> > > > > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Could not deassert ctrl reset control\n");
> > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(tcon_top->bus);
> > > > > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Could not enable bus clock\n");
> > > > > > > > + goto err_assert_reset;
> > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have to de-assert the reset control and enable the clock before the
> > > > > > > clocks it provides are registered. Otherwise a consumer may come in and
> > > > > > > ask for the provided clock to be enabled, but since the TCON TOP's own
> > > > > > > reset and clock are still disabled, you can't actually access the registers
> > > > > > > that controls the provided clock.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > These rst and bus are common reset and bus clocks not tcon top clocks
> > > > > > that are trying to register here. ie reason I have not moved it in
> > > > > > top.
> > > > >
> > > > > And you're sure that toggling bits in the TCON TOP block doesn't require
> > > > > the reset to be de-asserted and the bus clock enabled?
> > > > >
> > > > > Somehow I doubt that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Once the driver register the clocks it provides, they absolutely must work.
> > > > > They can't only work after the bind phase when the reset gets de-asserted
> > > > > and the bus clock enabled. Or you should provide proper error reporting
> > > > > in the clock ops. I doubt you want to go that way either.
> > > >
> > > > Why would they won't work after bind phase? unlike tcon top gates,
> > > > these reset, and bus are common like what we have in other DE block
> > > > so enable them in bind won't be an issue as per as I understand. let
> > > > me know if you want me to check in other directions.
> > >
> > > You misunderstood. When you moved the clock registering parts to the probe
> > > phase, but didn't move the clock enable and reset de-assert parts to go with,
> > > the clock ops will not work as expected between probe and bind time.
> >
> > If I understand correctly, I have moved tcon clock gates, not the bus
> > clock or the reset. Both have independent enablement phase, the bus
> > clock is enable in tcon top bind and the clock gate ("dsi") enable in
> > init call of phy_ops. is both bus clock and clock gates are same and
> > related that is what you are saying?
>
> I am saying that you may need the tcon top bus gates and resets properly
> configured to be able to read/write the tcon top address range. That includes
> enabling/disabling the clocks that the tcon top driver registers.
>
> In other words, the TCON TOP's bus gate and reset control have everything to do
> with what you can do within the TCON TOP block or address range.
>
> > >
> > > Simple way to verify it: Just use devmem to disable the TCON TOP bus gate
> > > and/or assert its reset control. Then try to toggle any of the bits in the
> > > TCON TOP block and see if it works, or if the bits stick.
> >
> > Yes I have verified "dsi" gate enablement before via devmem. Below is
> > the bus, reset disablement and re-enablement and result is similar for
> > the reset, bus clock in bind and even in probe.
> >
> > 00. get the existing value
> >
> > # devmem 0x1c70020
> > 0x00010000
> > # devmem 0x1c20064
> > 0x44021000
> > # devmem 0x1c202c4
> > 0x44021000
> >
> > 01: disable bus, and assert reset
> >
> > # devmem 0x1c20064 32 0x4021000
> > # devmem 0x1c202c4 32 0x4021000
> > # devmem 0x1c20064
> > 0x04021000
> > # devmem 0x1c202c4
> > 0x04021000
> > # devmem 0x1c70020
> > 0x00000000
>
> See here. The value became 0 when it was still 0x10000 in the previous phase.
> Any guesses to why this happened, assuming you didn't touch it?
Yes, I didn't touch anything here. and it indeed expected since the
bus and reset line goes disabled and asserted.
>
> Now if you keep the bus gate disabled and the reset control asserted, and
> try to write some non-zero value to 0x1c70020, and read it back, does the
> value stick?
No, value is not stick. what ever I wrote on on 0x1c70020 it is not taking.
>
> If you don't have the bus gate enabled and the reset control de-asserted,
> any operations you do to the TCON TOP is essentially not happening. Including
> bit operations that the clocks you registered are required to do.
>
> Get what I'm saying?
I understand it, the for accessing tcon space we have bus and reset
line to be enabled and desserted. But the thing is I didn't see any
difference in the behavior even If I enable or deassert the bus and
reset in probe or in bind.
The devmem numbers which I have listed above is same for both the
cases, one with this patch and another one is handle via probe
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ndHj9wHzvX/
>
> You need to have the bus gate enabled and the reset control de-asserted
> BEFORE you register the clocks you are providing, or something is going
> to go very wrong.
>
> Worst case scenario: the reset control was left de-asserted by the bootloader
> but the bus gate was disabled. When you register the clocks, the CCF tries
> to read back the current status of the clocks, and the I/O stalls because
> the bus gate wasn't enabled. System stalls.
>
> Do I need to draw a time flow chart for you?
Sure, please.
>
> Also see the very simple example:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun9i-a80-usb.c#L113
>
> where the bus gate is enabled before registering the clocks. This hardware
> block doesn't have a reset control for it, but the same principle applies.
Got it, thanks.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list