[PATCH 2/9] drm/syncobj: add new drm_syncobj_add_point interface v4

Lionel Landwerlin lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Thu Mar 28 13:50:22 UTC 2019


On 25/03/2019 08:32, Chunming Zhou wrote:
> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
>
> Use the dma_fence_chain object to create a timeline of fence objects
> instead of just replacing the existing fence.
>
> v2: rebase and cleanup
> v3: fix garbage collection parameters
> v4: add unorder point check, print a warn calltrace
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/drm/drm_syncobj.h     |  5 +++++
>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> index 5329e66598c6..19a9ce638119 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,45 @@ static void drm_syncobj_remove_wait(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
>   	spin_unlock(&syncobj->lock);
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * drm_syncobj_add_point - add new timeline point to the syncobj
> + * @syncobj: sync object to add timeline point do
> + * @chain: chain node to use to add the point
> + * @fence: fence to encapsulate in the chain node
> + * @point: sequence number to use for the point
> + *
> + * Add the chain node as new timeline point to the syncobj.
> + */
> +void drm_syncobj_add_point(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> +			   struct dma_fence_chain *chain,
> +			   struct dma_fence *fence,
> +			   uint64_t point)
> +{
> +	struct syncobj_wait_entry *cur, *tmp;
> +	struct dma_fence *prev;
> +
> +	dma_fence_get(fence);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
> +
> +	prev = drm_syncobj_fence_get(syncobj);
> +	/* You are adding an unorder point to timeline, which could cause payload returned from query_ioctl is 0! */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(prev && prev->seqno >= point);


I think the WARN/BUG macros should only fire when there is an issue with 
programming from within the kernel.

But this particular warning can be triggered by an application.


Probably best to just remove it?


-Lionel


> +	dma_fence_chain_init(chain, prev, fence, point);
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(syncobj->fence, &chain->base);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, &syncobj->cb_list, node) {
> +		list_del_init(&cur->node);
> +		syncobj_wait_syncobj_func(syncobj, cur);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&syncobj->lock);
> +
> +	/* Walk the chain once to trigger garbage collection */
> +	dma_fence_chain_for_each(fence, prev);
> +	dma_fence_put(prev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_syncobj_add_point);
> +
>   /**
>    * drm_syncobj_replace_fence - replace fence in a sync object.
>    * @syncobj: Sync object to replace fence in
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h b/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> index 0311c9fdbd2f..6cf7243a1dc5 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>   #define __DRM_SYNCOBJ_H__
>   
>   #include <linux/dma-fence.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-fence-chain.h>
>   
>   struct drm_file;
>   
> @@ -112,6 +113,10 @@ drm_syncobj_fence_get(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj)
>   
>   struct drm_syncobj *drm_syncobj_find(struct drm_file *file_private,
>   				     u32 handle);
> +void drm_syncobj_add_point(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> +			   struct dma_fence_chain *chain,
> +			   struct dma_fence *fence,
> +			   uint64_t point);
>   void drm_syncobj_replace_fence(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
>   			       struct dma_fence *fence);
>   int drm_syncobj_find_fence(struct drm_file *file_private,




More information about the dri-devel mailing list