[PATCH] staging: android: ion: refactory ion_alloc for kernel driver use

Zengtao (B) prime.zeng at hisilicon.com
Sat Mar 30 02:32:35 UTC 2019


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh at linuxfoundation.org]
>Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 12:04 AM
>To: Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng at hisilicon.com>
>Cc: labbott at redhat.com; sumit.semwal at linaro.org;
>devel at driverdev.osuosl.org; Todd Kjos <tkjos at android.com>;
>linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org;
>linaro-mm-sig at lists.linaro.org; Arve Hjønnevåg <arve at android.com>;
>Joel Fernandes <joel at joelfernandes.org>; Martijn Coenen
><maco at android.com>; Christian Brauner <christian at brauner.io>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: refactory ion_alloc for kernel
>driver use
>
>On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 02:40:16AM +0800, Zeng Tao wrote:
>> There are two reasons for this patch:
>> 1. There are some potential requirements for ion_alloc in kernel
>> space, some media drivers need to allocate media buffers from ion
>> instead of buddy or dma framework, this is more convient and clean
>> very for media drivers. And In that case, ion is the only media buffer
>> provider, it's more easier to maintain.
>
>As this really is just DMA, what is wrong with the existing dma framework
>that makes it hard to use?  You have seen all of the changes recently to it,
>right?

The current dma framework is powerful enough(to me, and more complex ^_^)
, CMA, IOMMU are all integrated, it's good. But buffer sharing, statistics, debug,
 are not so friendly for media drivers(each driver has to do all, but duplicate jobs).

>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h


More information about the dri-devel mailing list